Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/July/28

Stub tags for Category:Australian politician stubs subcats

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was oppose renaming. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 14:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Propose renaming: Rationalle: Per standard stub naming policies - these aren't Australian members of the X party, they're members of the Australian X party. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:03, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Australia-Labor-politician-stub to AustraliaLabor-politician-stub
 * Australia-Labor-representative-stub to AustraliaLabor-representative-stub
 * Australia-Labor-senator-stub to AustraliaLabor-senator-stub
 * Australia-Liberal-politician-stub to AustraliaLiberal-politician-stub
 * Australia-National-politician-stub to AustraliaNational-politician-stub


 * Oppose as currently proposed. The current form is more or less the standard - have a look at the recent proposals for Australian, Swedish and Dutch politician stub splits, which have all been of this format (as have similar ones for New Zealand). There is some confusion, since UK and Canadian ones use the format Foo-UK-politician-stub and Foo-Canadianprovince-politician-stub... It would in some ways make sense to used the UK/Canada form as standard, as they are subtypes of (e.g.,) Australia-politician-stub and may be better at (e.g.,) Labor-Australia-politician-stub. But the currently proposed new name isn't going to help and is just going to make a third variation. Grutness...wha?  01:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose The current form reads as "Australian politician of the (Australian) Labor Party"; the proposal would invent an "Australia Labor Party" which does not and has never existed. Orderinchaos 22:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nunavut politician stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was '''upmerge without prejudge for recreation once threshold is met.

I propose Upmerging this category for now - the category only has 42 stubs in it, and a scan only finds 4 more. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose 46 is so close to the threshold that it will likely meet the guidelines in a short time.--TM 04:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that if the current findable population is below 50, then we should upmerged without prejudge for recreation once enough population is tagged with the apprpriate stub tag. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:48, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.