Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/June/22

Rename of Cartoon Network-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was rename, delete current name; not upmerged, but may need to be revisited later

Propose rename to CartoonNetwork-stub -- or any other name that doesn't include a space. Dawynn (talk) 12:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom, and lose the current name. Would also suggest upmerging, given that it is only used on seven stubs. Grutness...wha?  13:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Rename and Upmerge per above. Waacstats (talk) 11:54, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Not so sure about the upmerge, as the permcat has 147 articles tagged as stubs; however, definitely Rename the template. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm willing to start tagging more articles (and there are definitely several that could be tagged), but wanted a valid tag first. Dawynn (talk) 15:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Youtube-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Speedied very slowly.

To the best of my knowledge, never used in over a year of existence. Given that the permcat parent only has some 180 articles, its necessity is questionable too. Delete. Note: if decision is to keep, it should be renamed to YouTube-stub per YouTube. Grutness...wha?  13:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as unused and incoreectly named. Waacstats (talk) 11:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Question: Is its intended scope the same as the deleted Youtube-videos-stub? If so, then this is a speedy G4 case. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Well spotted! Difficult to say what the scope's supposed to be since it's unused, but could well count as a G4. Grutness...wha?  09:31, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.