Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/June/6

Category:Horror stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was rename

Rename to, since the permcat has been renamed per Categories for discussion/Log/2011 May 29. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Rename per above. Waacstats (talk) 10:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

TijuanaMetroAreaBCN-geo-stub/

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Unproposed new category and template. No explanation given for the unusual template naming (which BCN is being suggested? None of these seem to fit), no indication that this will reach the size threshold (in fact, the new category is a subcategory of another unproposed category (see below) which does not reach threshold!). And, what's more, there's no indication yet that any Mexican citiesrequire their own stub types, or that splitting in this way is the best way of splitting them out. Delete. Grutness...wha?  02:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as undersized, unproposed and incorrectly named. Waacstats (talk) 10:40, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was upmerge, with no prejudice against later creation if it reaches the threshold level

Unproposed split from Mexico geography stubs, despite only having some 35 stubs. Reupmerge unless sufficient stubs can be found for it, as per debate when the template was created in 2008. BTW, both this and the above stub type were created by an editor who has already been warned twice against making stub types out of processin the last few weeks (s/he also created both Tijuana-stub and Las Vegas-stub below). Grutness...wha?  02:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep/Comment - A lot of other Mexican states have categories exactly like this. I don't understand why it is any different. Please see Category:Mexico geography stubs. 08OceanBeach S.D.  04:18, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's different because it hasn't reached the 60-stub threshold, as explained above, which all the others have. Please see WP:STUB. All the others met that threshold and were proposed as viable splits - the smallest of the other categories has 65 stubs. This is also why so many other Mexican state geo-stub templates (e.g., Aguascalientes-geo-stub, QuintanaRoo-geo-stub), are still upmerged. Grutness...wha?  00:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Upmerge till sufficient stubs exists. Waacstats (talk) 10:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.