Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/March/16

More premature categories

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, with no prejudice against re-creating later if/when needed'''

I propose deleting the following categories for now. In the future, provided there are enough articles to cover the standard threshhold (currently 60), these may be re-created:
 *  (5 P)

1990 birth would mean these players are at about college level or below. A bit early for being encyclopedia-worthy.
 *  (8 P)
 *  (9 P)

1980 birth would put a politician at about 30. Don't know about Japan, but many countries have age limits for government offices, with 30 being about the lowest. Dawynn (talk) 11:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 *  (3 P)


 * I'd still try to fill it. In many countries the age limit's far lower than 30. Here in New Zealand we've had MPs under 25 years old, and it may be the same in Japan. These categories all do seem a little premature, though. Grutness...wha?  22:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Anomodont-stub/Category:Anomodont stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep

An anomodont stub template was created a few months ago, along with a therapsid stub template. Since anomodonts are a type of therapsid, I don't see any reason for them having their own stub type. In comparison to other therapsid groups, anomodonts aren't particularly diverse. Currently there are 99 articles that use the template. I propose that this template be deleted, and the articles that use this stub instead use Therapsid-stub. Smokeybjb (talk) 19:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems like a reasonable subcategory, and certainly has enough stubs to warrant a separate type. Once other therapsid groups have similar large numbers of stub, separate templates will no doubt be proposed for them, too. Grutness...wha?  21:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.