Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/March/28


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, create new NK template

Dawynn (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Propose delete of and korea-university-stub.
 * Propose creation of NorthKorea-university-stub. All articles currently tagged with the Korea tag may be moved to the new NorthKorea tag.  Upmerge new template to both  and.
 * support Grutness...wha?  22:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

This is a conglomerate parent-only category trying to lump together two unrelated activities: diving and underwater diving. There is no related permcat for this conglomeration other than the higher parent which has its own stub category. Propose deleting this category as an unnecessary layer. Dawynn (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * support. ISTR this was created before the two separate subtypes were made. Grutness...wha?  22:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Delete as unnecessary. This is a parent-only stub category where both subcategories have over 100 articles. There is no such combined permcat. At this point, this category is just an extra layer. Dawynn
 * support. ISTR this was a holding pen while the subtypes were undersized. Grutness...wha?  22:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Delete as redundant. This is currently a parent-only stub category (that is, it does not have its own template). Both of the subcategories are fully filled with over 200 articles plus their own subcategories. Both of the categories are also found under the more general parent. At this point, this category is just an extra layer. Dawynn (talk) 11:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * support. ISTR this was also a holding pen while the subtypes were undersized. Grutness...wha?  22:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.