Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/May/8

English regional building and structure cats

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

,, and are now parent only, with all counties in these regions having their own categories. There are no equivalent permcats for these regional categories, and all they're now doing is adding an extra, unnecessary layer to the stub tree. I suggest these are deleted, and the same with any others once they reach the same stage of only containing subcategories. Grutness...wha?  01:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Incorrectly suggests that stub categories are subcategories of specific subject WikiProjects (they're not, though understandably specific WikiProjects do have strong connections with them). As such this should be renamed to, with the templates mentioned in the header but otherwise unlinked upmerged to it. Grutness...wha?  01:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

We don't really need a parent-only category with just one subcategory. Delete this extra layer and add directly to the parent. We can always re-create it if necessary if more potential subtypes appear.Grutness...wha?  01:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Ditto. We don't really need a parent-only category with just one subcategory. Delete this extra layer and add directly to the parent. We can always re-create it if necessary if more potential subtypes appear.Grutness...wha?  01:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete joint category, rename rocket stubs to rocketry stubs

Unnecessary parent-only category, a hang-over from the days when we grouped these two subjects together with one stub type. No longer needed - delete. And while we're on the subject, should probably be renamed, to match the permcat parent. Grutness...wha?  01:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No opinion. I had looked at this one a few times, but decided to leave it after reviewing the previous discussion.  That indicated a decision to leave the matter as is because of inter-wiki connections.  I'm not against a delete, though.  Dawynn (talk) 12:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair reason, but perhaps not a strong enough one to keep it - it's likely the Russian stub cat is appropriately linkable to one or the other of the subcats. The renaming of Rocket stubs is probably a good move regardless. Grutness...wha?  00:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WikiCopter 04:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.