Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/September/23

Portugal geography by District/Region categories

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:
 * Category:Autonomous Region of Madeira geography stubs → Category:Madeira geography stubs
 * Category:Bragança District geography stubs → Category:Bragança geography stubs
 * Category:Faro District geography stubs → Category:Faro geography stubs
 * Category:Lisbon District geography stubs → Category:Lisbon geography stubs
 * Category:Braga District geography stubs → Category:Braga geography stubs

-- DQ  (t)   (e)  09:56, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Rename
 * Autonomous Regions
 * Category:Autonomous Region of Madeira geography stubs → Category:Madeira geography stubs

or conversely rename
 * Category:Azores geography stubs → Category:Autonomous Region of Azores geography stubs

for consistency as both are (all the) Autonomous Regions Rename
 * Districts
 * Category:Bragança District geography stubs → Category:Bragança geography stubs
 * Category:Faro District geography stubs → Category:Faro geography stubs
 * Category:Lisbon District geography stubs → Category:Lisbon geography stubs
 * Category:Braga District geography stubs → Category:Braga geography stubs

or conversely rename
 * Category:Porto geography stubs → Category:Porto District geography stubs

for consistency as all are Districts

I'd prefer the first (and shorter) suggestion for each of the cases. For most Portuguese readers it will be obvious that, e.g., "Braga geography stubs" include the whole district, as typically we use simply "Braga" to refer both to the town and district, whenever context is clear. I guess it is not too likely that we'll need to split stub categories to have only town related articles (Lisbon has almost enough, but the cat is not large); and if we do, then we'll need to fix the templates themselves (currently, etc.). Anyway, the main point is consistency, so whatever way is fine. - Nabla (talk) 03:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.