Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2012/January/11


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Tried to fill, but still greatly undersized. Upmerge templates and delete category. No prejudice against recreation once templates populated. Dawynn (talk) 13:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Upmerge per Dawynn --Qetuth (talk) 11:51, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

European sports venue stub splits

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was

Procedural close, moving to CFD as part of SFD deprecation. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC) There are four regional splits under. But there has been a tradition, that once a country fills up, it is taken out of the regional category, and placed under the main European category. The downside is that one of these regional splits has now seen enough countries mature that it is now undersized. I propose that we do away with the regional splits altogether, and just upmerge any remaining countries into the European category.


 * (241 P)
 * (137 P)
 * (234 P)
 * (34 P)

This would mean that the main European category would then have around 700 articles. At the very least, I'd at least like to get rid of the Western category, and upmerge the remaining countries from that category into the European parent. Dawynn (talk) 10:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Support: Certainly East/North/West, and it then seems silly to leave South seperate. Bulgaria category is already speediable and Slovakia, Ukraine, Finland and Serbia are very close (about 50 stubs each), with those 5 countries taken out of the picture it'd be closer to 400 articles total, about half of them from the Southern Europe. --Qetuth (talk) 00:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Support, but consider merging all four to, so as to not overwhelm the parent category, and encourage categorisation by nation wherever not very small. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC) – עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Pluralize this one too:. Dawynn (talk) 03:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC) – עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Propose we rename this one to the plural:. Dawynn (talk) 02:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Agree, Rename both - I created both and didn't notice I hadn't pluralised until later. --Qetuth (talk) 23:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.