Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2012/January/2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Upmerge to. Ruslik_ Zero 16:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Reviewed permcat. Only found 30 stubs. Propose deleting category, upmerging template. No prejudcie against recreating category once template filled. Dawynn (talk) 19:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Upmerge to. Ruslik_ Zero 16:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Undersized. Only 36 articles in the perm cat. Propose deleting category, upmerging template. No prejudice against recreating category once template filled. Dawynn (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I wasn't aware that there's a minimum population requirement when I created it. My intention is to populate it with the 143 articles from here. Which category are you proposing for deletion? The Slovenian railway station stubs or the Railway stations in Slovenia category?
 * We manage only the stub categories. This discussion concerns only the Slovenian railway station stubs category.  Dawynn (talk) 03:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete with no prejudice to recreation if 60 stub articles are reached. SeveroTC 06:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Upmerge to. The category now has only 26 articles—less than in January. Ruslik_ Zero 16:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Undersized. Only 29 articles in the perm cat. Propose delete. Dawynn (talk) 16:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose: The article Thiara (gastropod) alone has almost 20 species with red links. These articles are waiting to be created. We have a bot at work at present in our project creating in the long run several ten thousand articles. In time, all the stub templates with less than 30 blue links will be filled up. There is no need to delete them now, just to be created again in the near future. JoJan (talk) 09:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete the category, with no prejudice against recerating when there are 60 stubs tagged with the Thiaridae-stub. The bot can tag the new articles with the stub tag (which isn't up for deletion), and when there are enough stubs, the category can be recreated. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.