Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2012/May/7


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Upmerge without prejudice to recreation when 60 transclusions are reached. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:17, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Delete - as per Proposals, premature; 3 transclusions, 29 articles in permcat. Delete without prejudice to recreation when 60 transclusions are reached. SeveroTC 08:58, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Upmerge until there are at least 60 stubs for this category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:42, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Delete - unproposed, no problem with an upmerged template but 2 transclusions and 3 articles in permcat shows just how premature a stub category is. SeveroTC 08:58, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.