Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/24.184.206.83 (2nd)

User:24.184.206.83

 * Suspected sock puppeteer


 * Suspected sock puppets


 * Report submission by
 * ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez  Get to know me!  /  Talk to me!  ←at≈:→ 05:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Evidence
 * User:Ghost109 quickly logs on (1 minute!) to assert that "indeed his 'cousin'" is the one using the anon. IP (the supposed user of the computer without being logged in under any account)
 * Quick start of editing under anonymous IP right after Ghost109 "logged out". The editing continued from the IP here, here, and then mysteriously switches to the other SOCK-suspected IP here. There's two more edits for 71.246... and we switch right back over to 24.184... here.
 * You'd think that'd be enough for one day, but no!. Switching right back over: here.
 * 24.184... keeps going for a little while. Then who else but User:Mother Niggle to "save the day!" here!. (The anon IP userpage is actually started off with a SOCKPUPPET tag of Mother Niggle and is left on while 24.184... goes on and explains his family tree)
 * It stays while "the family" logs on and "verifies their identity" and then 24.184... decides it must've been added by someone who "hates [him". (I mention this a few lines down)


 * Mother... gets tired after one edit, and 74.246... makes a quick comeback: here. (The most current edition is by User:nneonneo, and that's to whom Ghost... goes and states that 24.184... should be banned. -- actually, he seeks sysop J.delanoy's help here)
 * He's been making it a priority to let everyone he can "know" that "it's not him" but his "cousin" making edits, as he did here and here. Used the old well-known "I got hacked" excuse here (well, he said he "changed [his] password").
 * Plays the pathos/logos authority card by boldly suggesting that 24.184... be banned here.


 * Both participate in voting for merger at the Talk:Frasier page.


 * Comments

This is nothing more than a pathetic personal attack on me. I have stated that this IP address IS MINE. You don't care about this situation, you only care about the fact that I defeated you in an argument. The reason I knew about it one minute after? Perhaps you need to learn how to read. He was on the Laptop, which I had no knowledge of the fact that it shared the same IP as this computer, and I was on the computer which controls the network. I was on Wikipedia at the time, and you could say I'm responsible for him being on Wikipedia at the same time on a different computer as me, because I told him the story about how I was in an argument with a wannabe admin at the time and jokingly made a comment about his extremely old account. Once again you can tell by the typing styles, and if Wikipedia's IP checks were thorougher you could see what came from the Laptop and what came from my computer. I want you to know that what you're doing is truly sad, Sanchez. You're acting like you know about a situation you simply don't because being a wannabe admin clouds your judgement. Ghost109 (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * My favorite part of this accusation is not about the fact it's from pure resentment, but you're trying to say because I defend myself I'm guilty. Ghost109 (talk) 20:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, I have made sure this account has not been responsible of vandalism. I have one blemish due to leaving my account logged in at the wrong time. As a matter of fact I'm quite the opposite and try to stop vandalism without telling the world on my page how I wish I could be an admin... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MamaVeemon

Ghost109 (talk) 20:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Not a vandal, eh?, ) ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez  Get to know me!  /  Talk to me!  ←at≈:→ 21:11, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ROFL!!! I can't tell what's funnier, the fact that you still can't get your facts straight, the fact that that you are once again talking about a situation in which you know nothing about (check the editor who undid that vandalism to see my apology for leaving my account logged in, as I said before but you were too ignorant to see that) or the fact that after those two paragraphs you only have an interchangeable rhetorical question in which I answered before you asked. Admit it, you just have a grudge against me for beating you in an argument, wannabe admin. Ghost109 (talk) 22:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That was about the first piece of evidence. Once again in the second piece of evidence, you've proven your ignorance, this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jagex&diff=next&oldid=232609044 is not vandalism. It was good faith, and sourced by multiple secondary sources. Can you make it more obvious that you're just assuming things out of bias because you dislike me? Ghost109 (talk) 22:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * And by the way, once again, your ignorance proves strong, as 71.246.120.155 is both mine and my cousin's friend. Look how different these two IPs are, and you're going to say that I'm a sock puppeteer and this isn't just some wannabe admins biased opinion? And also, if you want, I'd be happy to tell you the IP of my main computer and the laptop. Ghost109 (talk) 23:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * rofl rofl, ok ok so were talking about teh council of taranoga or whatever, ok ill explain lmfao its simple vandalism tho, ok, i go on the comp, i see wikipedia stil open, i hit random article and edit it, i see im still logged in ghost so i log out, and i tell my friends about the article cause benjamin zhao is someone we know, and one of them vandalizes it with me, ok so after liek 2 edits, it gets undone, so i log in here and undo the undo so it might not be noticed and vandal on ip again ok, then when it undone a second time i just get bored and play video games.

ok my grammer might not be best but you shoud still understand what Im typing, ok --Mother Niggle (talk) 19:58, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey Esanchez! What's the matter? You can still stalk my contributions yet can't respond to my comments at all directly? You have failed in this sad personal attack, truely, utterly, failed. Every time you have tried to argue with me you wind up running off after I disprove one of your pathetic one-liners. I know you're still stalking me (as you spend all day on Wikipedia and are adding evidence from my contributions) but it is simply sad, how obvious you make it that this is just a personal attack. All you are doing is sitting on Wikipedia 24/7 and viewing my contributions. I'll say it again, you can't respond to me. All you can do is act like a 5 year old reporting the kid in his kindergarten class that was mean to him. Pathetic. What a worthless attempt. It tells me so much about you. Ghost109 (talk) 02:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

✅ via checkuser that, , , , , Ghost109 blocked one week, others indef.
 * Conclusions
 * 71.246.120.155 appears unrelated. No action. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 12:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)