Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/2Legit2Quit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:2Legit2Quit
Near identical edits and usernames: &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Evidence
 * Edit by to Association fallacy on September 2, 2006, with text related to the Vaughan 2006 election and edit summary: "added a wikipedia relevant example"
 * Identical first edit by on September 8, 2006, with identical text related to the Vaughan 2006 election and with essentiall identical edit summary: "added a wikipedia relevant examples"; with an added comment about an admin who had been notified about 2Legit2Quit.
 * Of course, the usernames.
 * Adding who just repeated the above edit. &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 01:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It was brought up earlier when 2Legit2Quit registered that he/she might be a VaughanWatch sockpuppet. &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The username itself (both of them) are clearly related (by virtue of the two users' intimate knowledge of VaughanGate upon registration) to the recent trolling escapade by socks of VaughanWatch/JohnnyCanuck. JC was recently indef blocked as a sock of VW, immediately following which, his socks began blanking pages and replacing them with slogans to the extent of "___________ user is ugly, unblock JohnnyCanuck" (with the ____ being replaced by myself or JamesTeterenko). -- pm_shef 22:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Accounts mentioned have been blocked. Iola k ana • T 17:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)