Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/71.111.119.60


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:71.111.119.60

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by:EvilCouch 14:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

User 71.111.115.155 was blocked. The block was reviewed and upheld. User 71.111.119.60 was blocked as a sockpuppet of 71.111.155.
 * Evidence

71.111.117.65 is most certainly the same person.

 "Admin Glen S has made a totally inapprobriate block here. Please Unblock. There are Two very good reasons. 1- The users are not the same and 2-Just as Important the reason given was evading of block! But the the previous block of 31 hours had already EXPIRED!!  3- As far as I know users do not always choose their ISP address so it wouldn't be intentional (this is moot since these two people are not sock puppets)

''Please see time diff: (over 31 hours had pasted even for the sake of argument it was the same IP address user which it clearly was not) [] [] Please unblock User 119.60 and notify/Warn User:Glen_S of his terrible mistake. Thanks I have reason to believe that Glen_S's block of this user therefore was a pretext and possible racially motivated for attempted contributions to the Michael Richards article, which would be a is a serious violation of WP. Thank you.''"

Compare to

"This is the biggest news story since the Iraq War and 9/11 yet Wiki refuses to put it in their headlines! Enough of this Pro-Kramer BIAS in the the editing note WP:Bias   I guess people in White Hoods like to stick together.  Power to the People! Including colored people!  More people at Wiki support Richards Rant than I thought very sad. Says something about the problems of this article."

Note the similar accusations of racial bias, the very similar IP addresses and close time lines. Additionally, User 71.111.117.65 is doing unusually large amounts of campaigning to unblock the already verified sockpuppets.


 * Comments

The block on 71.111.119.60 has expired long ago before the ban which makes it invalid. Whats with the vendetta and not AGF. People are just attacking me for no good reason. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.111.117.65 (talk • contribs) 08:32, 24 November 2006 (PST).

I hesitate to block IPs that haven't edited since November. No action. AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions