Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/72.35.4.220

User:72.35.4.220

 * Suspected sock puppeteer


 * Suspected sock puppets


 * Report submission by
 * Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

During a recent influx of sockpuppets (see Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive480), started editing articles which I have edited or are related to articles I have edited. Assuming they were another Swamilive sockpuppet, I reported them as such. Swamilive sock appeared on my talk to deny that Jeztheham was their sock. Another Swamilive sock (still unblocked incidentally) started a discussion on my talk page, which was joined by. The IP asked about who has harassed me off-wiki. Soon after, new account added personal attacks ( & ) to a discussion involving images uploaded by Bellinghaus, and used their edit contributions to spell out "there are no Marilyn F A N S", when read backwards. User:Jeztheham also edited the portion of related to Bellinghaus.
 * Evidence

User:Bellend House added a section to. It was reverted. The exact same section was then re-added (5 times within the space of an hour) by User:72.35.4.220.


 * Comments
 * Request checkuser, please. Ask them to uncover the entire sockfarm, and reference this report as the evidence. Jehochman Talk 20:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * See Requests_for_checkuser/Case/72.35.4.220. Note that is indef blocked. Both  and  have been temporarily blocked for edits made after this report was filed. I have added two IPs that took up the edit war after  was blocked. Note that they are from the same ISP used by some  socks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Adding another IP. No vandalism, just circumstantial evidence (editing and same ISP). Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Add all accounts to your request, noting which are already blocked. This may help the Checkusers. Jehochman Talk 22:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Adding one more obvious Swamilive sock IP. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Part of the addition to Chav was used in an edit summary by. Also the edits on Bruce (disambiguation) by are the same as on Bruce by  and other sockpuppets. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 22:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * As well, the recent aggressive edits by to Octopus, regarding a minor grammatical issue already discussed on article talk page, are identical to those by  not long ago . JNW (talk) 23:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * And now, taking things to a new level, see the image changing hijinks at the Chav article image. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Bellend House should be blocked indef for a username like that (bell-end). As for everything else here, it looks incredibly damning. Yesterday I had to report his IP for continually changing the image on Chav, claiming there was a consensus to do so, and then I noticed the image today had changed, but nothing in the history showed. So I checked the commons log, and a brand new user had reuploaded over the old image. Extremely fishy, and very disruptive. -- how do you turn this on  16:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

See checkuser request. -- how do you turn this on  18:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've struck the above comment because there is an existing checkuser request already linked. The two have been merged. See Requests for checkuser/Case/72.35.4.220. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I've added, despite Swamilive's denial that it's theirs, because of the earlier User:Bellend House account, and the Bellinghause-related edits by User:Meffed. Note that some of this account's contributions have been oversighted already. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: I really think we should move all the information here to the CU request. It's a bit pointless having two pages about the same problem open at once. -- how do you turn this on  23:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

See Requests for checkuser/Case/72.35.4.220 for more information. User:Gfh7578 not blocked due to comment at the CU page that it is unrelated. Cirt (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions