Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/74.13.29.56

User:74.13.29.56

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Mayalld (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Both IP addresses aclearly the same person, as one is responding to warnings on the other's talk page, and both are engaged in a rather silly edit war, in which they have failed to follow WP:CIVIL, and have stated an intent not to do so.
 * Evidence

Mayalld, you're an idiot, it's called an ISP, dynamic IP assignment is common, one rarely is given a statically assigned IP. Welcome to the Internet, here's your sign. 74.13.48.155 (talk) 00:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Whoo, look at me, I reset my router and now I have a different IP, and cannot post as either of the previously listed IPs! Oh noes!  Seriously Mayalld, you need to read up on the Internet-related articles, so that you can understand how limited the number of available IP addresses are with IPv4.  It'll help you understand how ISPs conserve their IP allotment and only assign them to active users instead of handing them all out, one to every customer.  74.13.59.80 (talk) 00:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am well aware of dynamic IP addressing, but thank you for coming along here to display your determination to ignore WP:CIVIL Mayalld (talk) 11:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, it would seem KnowledgeOfSelf is hard of reading, since such a block of a singular IP cannot do anything in such a situation. Regardless, the removal of my comments will continue to be undone until I grow bored of it.  74.13.33.150 (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * A 3-hour rangeblock of 74.13.0.0/16 brought only temporary relief, and this user is back restoring personal attacks.Mayalld (talk) 22:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

pages, and it looks like that's been done. --Akhilleus (talk) 06:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Cases like this are fairly useless, since we can't effectively block dynamic IPs. The solution is to use protection on the affected