Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/82.19.66.37

User:82.19.66.37

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

-- Craigtalbert 02:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Edits from 82.19.66.37, 213.235.24.138 follow eachother in Alcoholics Anonymous article, and comments from both addresses in other talk pages, such as mine.
 * Evidence

Same person edits from 82.19.66.37, 213.235.24.138. Makes vandalism difficult to document when there is repeated abuse from both IPs. When vandalism and violations of 3RR occur from the sum of edits of both IPs, it would be nice to be able to report them.
 * Comments

Some advice on the conclusion, for whoever decides these things. I am 82.19.66.37 and 213.235.24.138. This is not for "sock puppet" purposes, though, but rather because one is my work comp, and one is my home comp. The reporter of this "suspected sock puppetry" has repeatedly blanked contributions of mine in the AA talk page (which is generally considered vandalism) and clearly has some sort of strange vendetta against me. When I informed him that I was going to report him for vandalism, he decided to report me for sock-puppetry. Know that, then reach your own conclusions. 82.19.66.37 20:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Maybe we need some arbitration too. I don't have anything against you, I just would like to see conversation on the Talk:Alcoholics_Anonymous talk page continue to be about the article, and I don't think it's right that you circumvent the three revert rule by using two different IP addresses. You seem smart, and that you know what you're talking about, and I'd like to collaborate with you. But I think wikipedia guidelines need to be followed, and when they are I believe they produce good objective articles, and make it easier for people to work together. I will submit a request for arbitration and see if we can't just work this out. -- Craigtalbert 21:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Sure, but blanking talk pages is vandalism, which kind of supercedes the three revert rule (I am sure that it doesn't apply in cases of vandalism....), so this kind of doesn't matter.

I am more than happy for arbitration. Basically, anything which will help me get some more sources allowed into the AA thing (and thus reach "concensus", in the true sense, as well as the wiki sense) is fine with me. 213.235.24.138 12:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Responding on your (213.235.24.138) talk page, this is not the appropriate place for it. -- Craigtalbert 13:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)