Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ant jo

User:Ant jo

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Yopie 12:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Evidence

All puppets are new, with edits only in article Order of the Collar of Saint Agatha and were used as reverters and/or editors in POV of their master. Yopie 12:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Added Karl Agathon and Agony Agatha - names are very close to "Order of st. Agatha, and "Agony Agatha" is stalking me, after sockpuppet reporting.Yopie 19:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I find this accusation outrageous. My name is Daniel Milton, I was e-mailed about the discussion and editing of the article about the Order of St. Agatha from a friend, and I have nothing to do with any of the other users mentioned here. I have never heard of any "Karl Agathon" or similar.Daniel Milton (talk) 14:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Please, read WP:MEAT Yopie 14:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

The users listed in "sock puppets" are likely all the same. I am less certain about the link to Ant jo. If you could provide diffs where different accounts make similar edits, that would help. Checkuser might also help, if you can establish that these accounts tag-teamed in an edit-war (which you assert without citing the evidence explicitly). Yechiel (Shalom) 03:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Please, take a look at |history of article about Order of. St. Agatha. Puppets edits only this article. Of course, and  stalking me in many articles, for example  Duchy of Oels, House of Rosenberg, Carpatho-Ukraine, Talk:Z Vlašime, Armorial of the Holy Roman Empire.  With time, this user is more vulgar and aggressive, see  - "CUNT".

Connection to user Ant jo is certain, because he make POV edits in article Order of the Collar of Saint Agatha, and after discussion with me and  begin "sock puppet war", and this war graduated from discussion to stalking and unexplained reverts. Yopie 14:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * looks like another, with similar name and the users contributions consist of undoing edits by without explanation, it is almost certainly a sockpuppet whether it's the same user or not. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 12:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Um, no, sockpuppetry refers to the same user abusing more than one account. If it's not the same person, then it's meatpuppetry. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Clarification: looks like a user who is already involved in a dispute or edit war and has created another account for disruption/harassment (reverting another user's edits indiscriminately), and is almost certainly the same user who has created at least some of the accounts already named here (one of which is ) but not necessarily that they are all the same user. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 20:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Since Daniel Milton claims innocence, and I am not a big supporter of blocking meat puppets who are not actually sockpuppets, I think the best thing is to request checkuser. Please wait. Yechiel (Shalom) 23:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Checkuser filed: Requests for checkuser/Case/Ant jo. Yechiel (Shalom) 23:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Result of the checkuser case: two people apparently control all the accounts between them. All are blocked by Rudget. Yechiel (Shalom) 19:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC)