Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ashill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Ashill

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

HarryAlffa (talk) 23:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

On the Solar System talk page the three users seem to fit into three grades.
 * Evidence
 * 1) Ashill is the most reasonable and verbose
 * 2) Serendipodous does little but nay-say things, and doesn't offer counter-arguments, or offers simple support statements. Counter arguments which are offered have stupid points.
 * 3) Ckatz has made one contribution to the talk page from this point forward, but imposes the "consensus" view of the other two, when the discussion hasn't conclude and logical points remain unchallenged. Ashill then concretely supports Ckatz's edits when he had previously shown some flexibility.
 * 4) Ashill proposed Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:May_contain_nuts, he must have been "spying" on my contributions because I didn't tell him. Then Ckatz votes to delete it as well. Again, I didn't tell Ckatz about the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by HarryAlffa (talk • contribs) 19:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

This action by User:HarryAlffa is laughable, at best, but is truly an indication of what the regular editors at Solar System have been subjected to over the past few weeks. HarryAlffa has not managed to gain any support for his proposed changes there, and has since resorted to a series of disruptive actions. The most recent of these include this utterly unreasonable sockpuppet claim, coupled with a "checkuser' request directed at Ashill, Serendipodous, and myself, and numerous inappropriate comments aimed at other editors. To be perfectly honest, if not for my past involvement with the article in question, I would have blocked HarryAlffa for disruptive behaviour quite some time ago. He is certainly causing a great deal of problems for other editors. --Ckatz chat spy  22:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC) I'm not sure how to link to the revision history of the Solar System page, but you will find many, many edits by myself and the other three user accounts!
 * Comment from Ckatz
 * Comments

At best, three users are operating a cabal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarryAlffa (talk • contribs)
 * Conclusions

This report is meritless. No action required other than to ask the filer not to continue disruptive efforts at winning a content dispute. Jehochman Talk 18:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)