Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Blake911


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Lenapecal911
User:Lenapecal911 has been the strongest advocate for either the inclusion of the Bloodclan guildpage(up for AfD), or the exclusion of the Shadowclan guildpage(also up for AfD), his stance depending on if Bloodclan is kept or not. He or she has written some other non-notable articles other than the Bloodclan article (he or she was the original author) such as the Van Cleeve article (a vanity article written about himself or herself), and other articles related to his family members. He or she took great offense to anyone offering opposition to his stances (all of his articles went up for AfD, most were deleted) and was banned for 24 hours for personal attack after repeated warnings[]. I say all of that to give context to the situation as it appears he has created a sock puppet, User:Jackson512 and voted again in the Bloodclan AfD. Both Jackson 512 and Lena 911 have similar arguements for the inclusion of the Bloodclan article. That being that if the Shadowclan article is included, then the bloodclan must be included by default as well. This is not out of the ordinary on its' own, as even I agree with others and vote per nom or per (insert user's arguement). What brings me to suspect sockpuppetry is that Jackson512 has had no other votes prior to today, is a brand new account, and managed to find his way directly to the Bloodclan AfD page[]. Another concern to be brough to light is where Lena threatened the re-opening of already deleted, non-notable articles[] and the use of multiple computers, ISP addresses, and accounts though use of, what he boasts, to be several office locations and home places that have access to the internet[] to circumvent any action taken against her or his articles.
 * Evidence

I hope I made it clear, please alert me if I can improve upon this to make it easier to discern the truth, or if I havn't made valid enough arguement. Regards, Shazbot85 Talk 00:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Choirboy, a new single purpose account, also seems to very likely be a Lena! --Jestix 06:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comments

Reiteration User:Lenapecal911 threatened to use other internet access points to bypass IP identification[]. He or she boasts on the Jackson512 talk page that his IP is different[]. I ask, why would a brand new user immediatly offer this defense? How would he or she know such things would be checked for? Shazbot85 Talk 15:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

It should be noted that User:Jackson512 came into existence 10 hours after User:Lenapecal911 was issued a 24-hour block. Jackson512 additionally seems to be picking up where Lenapecal911 left off (see Articles for deletion/Bloodclan). Simoes 15:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Obvious; no new Wikipedia comes to Wikipedia and immediately gets involved in a dispute without prior knowledge of it happening. Iola k ana • T  17:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)