Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Bouha

User:Bouha

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Irrer 14:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by


 * []


 * User Drmaik replied to an explanation I wrote for Bouha, at her/his request. Drmaik mistakenly signed his/her retort as Drmaik then quickly changed the signature to Bouha, while simultaneously changing some words in an attempt to mask the changing of signatures.


 * Bouha is editing under two accounts, the second of which is Drmail.


 * It seems to me, at least at first glance, that these two accounts are editing different areas of the project, and aren't violating WP:SOCK -- anybody else have an opinion, on that? Am I missing something? – Luna Santin  (talk) 20:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The reporter, IRRER is a sockpuppet of an indefinately banned vandal originally appearing as MARIAM83 and now under multiple other handles. I have not noticed any particular sign that Drmaik and Bouha are the same, other than that one edit that might have been an error or might not..., but regardless the MARIAM83 has a particularly paranoid and vicious streak so I would not give this much credence. collounsbury 17:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC).


 * Collounsbury, a longtime contributor much like Drmaik/Bouha, is also, much like Drmaik/Bouha, British, Christian and particularly intent on editing articles about Arab/Muslim countries that both are clearly unfamiliar with, not only because of background/origins, but mainly because they are obviously not experts in the area. Collounsbury, as usual, overlooks evidence if it does not corroborate his POV "beliefs." Fact, as the above link demonstrates, Drmaik is Bouha, and as Drmaik's ENTIRE history demonstrates, Drmaik has contributed to Bouha's special articles, which might explain why on Drmaik's talkpage, prior to this discovery, Mariam83 left a message about a deletion or reversion made to sourced and factual material. Nonetheless, in a fascist portal such as this one, I do not expect dedicated drones to be punished, nor do I much care if such fascist drones are. Sadly, what should matter, content, does not, and people like Collounsbury seem intent on its distortion, as is evidenced by his pov, unsourced edits, blindly imposed. OCD.


 * Of course, Bouha/Drmaik shouldn't be blocked, as he doesn't seem particularly malicious, though much like the rest, compromises accuracy and content with his unfamiliarity w/ certain topis. And as most of you probably have multiple accounts, and if not, manipulate the system in a way that elicits "consensus" rather artifically, this is pointless, but I just wanted to prove how flagrant wikimania hypocrisy is.

Closing. The accuser is now indef-blocked as an abusive sockpuppet of a banned user, and seems to be admitting that this is a frivolous case designed to make a point. MastCell Talk 16:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions