Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Chadbryant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Chadbryant

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

DXRAW 21:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Report submission by:

IP has been removing information against consensus on Rec.sport.pro-wrestling he is trying to WP:OWN which is also a trait of Chadbryant. Also has been not WP:CIVIL
 * Evidence
 * Comments
 * Even assuming your accusations towards Chadbryant are true, which I do not think they are, having the same character traits is absolutely no evidence towards being a sockpuppet. -Amarkov blahedits 15:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You might want to tell Chadbryant that. I don't log onto Wikipedia for a couple of days, and guess what I find on my user page when I return? A sockpuppet tag with an accusation of me being another person which I clearly am not... --Inara Junkie 04:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * This is another in a very long line of tactics being employed by DXRAW in an attempt to harass me. This user has consistently refused to assume good faith, has blindly reverted my edits to several articles simply because I have made them (witness his blind reverts to Vinny Appice and Cozy Powell after I revoved redundant categories for both), and has proposed deletion for at least one article (Rollen Stewart) simply because I did some cleanup on the article. It should be noted that the IP address in question is a proxy open to any and all users of AOL. - Chadbryant 19:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * No one is "harrassing" you. You have repeatedly removed references to professional wrestling events out of sports arena entries. Just because you have become disinterested and disheartened by the behavior of others on Wikipedia regarding professional wrestling does not give you the authority to remove it from Wikipedia entirely. In a sense you are no different than those who have committed, or attempted to commit, genocide, in that you are trying to remove what you do not like to see. Though I can not speak for said user, looking at the behavior you have demonstrated I would assume that he began to revert the articles because you gave no justification for your behavior, did not attempt to reason or explain your behavior on the talk pages as others would try to do, you have a history of negative behavior on Wikipedia as shown through your contributions page and thus it can be construed you are reverting in bad faith, and you do not listen to or attempt to interact with those users with whom you are causing trouble and problems, i.e. you delete comments from your talk page yet according to your contributions page when others delete yours from their talk pages you place them back in.


 * In summary your behavior leaves a lot to be questioned and your accusations leave nothing but a line of negative consequences and difficulties created as a result of the initial accusations. Please stop with such behavior and try to work out your problems in a mature and professional manner with as much courtesy as you can muster; if you can not do this then I suggest you take some time off of Wikipedia to evalute yourself and figure out why this is so. --Inara Junkie 04:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * No. You can not compare content disputes to genocide. That is a blatant personal attack. You will be reported if you make further comments like that. -Amarkov blahedits 05:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Chadbryant has been blocked indefinitely on Dec 7, the IP has not edited since Nov 17. AnonEMouse (squeak) 03:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)