Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Chondrite

User:Viriditas

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

(Simonapro 07:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC))
 * Report submission by:

Edits made to [Cannabis], [Greg Green] and [Heaven's Stairway]. Matches previous harrasement and vandalism cases. General harrasement of user:Simonapro, and general harrasement on other articles which Simonapro is on. Are they the same person?
 * Evidence
 * Comments
 * Conclusions

Comment from SqueakBox
This page looks like trolling to me, this user today engages in vandalism of an article while accusing Chondrite of imaginary vandalism. He or she also engages in personal attacks against Chondrite here. Myself and another user are trying to dialogue with Simanpro, without any success and I would imagine it should be Simanpro's, and not Chondrite's, behaviour that should be under admin scrutiny. Some diffs by Simanpro would also be useful, at the moment he is leaving all the work to be done by whoever investigates this case, and without diffs there is no way of really analysing the veracity of the case, SqueakBox 07:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Additional comments about SqueakBox
This guy recently asked me not to complain about this. To be honest he is out-of-nowhere and asking me not to complain about this. '''Since the sock puppet topic has been avoided completely by SquekBox (who I previously asked to leave me alone and stop giving me advice, which he has ignored) I can only hope that someone here who is awake will get around to answering the question that has been asked. Are they same IP or not? (Simonapro 07:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC))

I am hardly out of nowhere, been editing cannabis a lot longer than any of the other current editors...We are not from the same ip as I believe Chondrite doesnt live in Honduras. Given Simonpro has just threatened Chondrite ...SqueakBox 07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Out of nowhere, as in I do not know you. Out of the 100s of articles I work on, never met you before.
 * It does not surprise you don't want to dig this one up even though it has nothing to do with you. You are like the others making lots of mistakes from the get go. You even think I am claiming you are sockpuppet here. With that level of poor concentration going on who are you to question me about anything?
 * Still if another mod in here wants to try, be my guest because it is looking ever more suspecious.

The problem is quite simple and you have also supported the recent revert which attributes a copyright statement by the author Greg Green to the researcher Small. Not only is that probably illegal, its just plainly against wikipolicy. (Simonapro 07:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC))


 * Viriditas first edited in August 2004, 2 years before Chondrite's first edit so to describe Viridias as Chondrite's sockpuppet is clearly nonsense, SqueakBox 07:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC) SqueakBox 07:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment by Chondrite
As pointed out by User:SqueakBox, User:Viriditas has been editing at Wikipedia far longer than I have. I have never edited at Heaven's Stairway, and Viriditas has never edited at Greg Green. Viriditas has edited at Cannabis, but nothing recent and nothing controversial that I could find in the last 1500 edits at that page. I suggest that this is a frivolous report. Chondrite 08:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment by Viriditas
I haven't a clue as to what this dispute is about or why I have been named as a "sockpuppet", but I do recognize the user name making the allegation as someone I was involved in a dispute with on the Heaven's Stairway article some time ago  (Note: it has just come to my attention that Simonapro has reverted the Heaven's Stairway article to an unsourced  version infused with original research from April, and I have reverted accordingly). If someone has the time to explain this dispute to me, or how my name came up, please leave me a message on talk. Thanks. &mdash;Viriditas | Talk 11:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment by Addhoc
In the context of no diffs beng provided and the editor raising this case being indefinitely blocked, I would suggest this case should be archived. Addhoc 11:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)