Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Clamorformore

User:Clamorformore

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * (Added an argument for keeping to the afd... hours after the page had been deleted)
 * (Added an argument for keeping to the afd... hours after the page had been deleted)
 * (Added an argument for keeping to the afd... hours after the page had been deleted)
 * (Added an argument for keeping to the afd... hours after the page had been deleted)
 * (Added an argument for keeping to the afd... hours after the page had been deleted)
 * (Added an argument for keeping to the afd... hours after the page had been deleted)
 * (Added an argument for keeping to the afd... hours after the page had been deleted)
 * (Added an argument for keeping to the afd... hours after the page had been deleted)

Mayalld (talk) 07:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Blatant (and dreadfully amateurish) vote stuffing attempt at Articles for deletion/Alexis Jones
 * Evidence


 * Comments
 * Seems to be well-founded suspicion of sockpuppetry. It took me three tries to make a comment because of the disruptive edits causing an "edit conflict." Several socks were created within 10 minutes of each other.--Sallicio$\color{Red} \oplus$ 07:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

-Rob —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uscrob (talk • contribs) 08:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I am a huge fan of Alexis Jones as well as Survivor and I'm sure the other people who want to keep her bio are as well. Who are you to say she is not newsworthy? Do you know how many people become stars over night? Just because you haven't heard of someone doesn't mean they aren't an influential member of contemporary society. What is your personal vendetta against her? How does it benefit you to try to prove she isn't famous? Wouldn't your time be better spent trying to improve your life rather than attacking hers? Maybe you could use one of her empowerment lectures. I can't wait until she blows up even more and this whole thing shame slaps you across the face. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Con Amor,
 * If she does something notable, then the page can be recreated. No big deal. -- Scorpion0422 17:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh, the Alexis Jones discussion is irrelevant here. This page is for dealing with the sockpuppet allegations. Everyone of the socks should be banned, with a stiff block for the puppeteer.--Sallicio$\color{Red} \oplus$ 18:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You actually missed a few. There were two or three others who edited the article and talk page with arguments for keeping the page but didn't make it to the afd. It also might not hurt to include, who created the page. -- Scorpion0422 17:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Patent socks - passes the duck test so spectacularly it's almost insulting (leaving aside the fact that the comment above is insulting). I'd advocate blocking the lot of them for abuse of multiple accounts, and would have done it already if I wasn't on my public account... The public face of GBT/C 09:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * All sockpuppets blocked apart from Voodoorex, who doesn't appear to correlate with the other users. However if they do continue with the same trend then feel free to bring back here. Master blocked one week. Rudget | talk 18:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)