Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Cryogenesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

 Arrived specificaly to support arguments for Cryogenesis in regards to the Spellbinder. His information comes out sounding as false as he suddenly has evidence about 3 20 year old books that no one else can prove of there existance. The posting style is the same as Cryogenesis as we have information without evidence. Argument without substance.Quode 14:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

. Arrives to add a single vote for dreadmire with no explanation. No more involvement after that.

. Arrives to give the perfect statment geared towards the delete argument. This person just happened to arrive here, find Dreadmire and jump right in with the perfect comment. Then vanishes.

. This one makes the same arguments as Cryogenesis and makes false accusations against Quode as to organizing meat puppets to delete Dreadmire. Again the same arguments and paranoia as Cryogenesis

. Attacked and vandalized the Randy Richards site due to comments made about Randy and his behavior at Coastcon. This issue hit a major nerve with Cryogenesis who claimed to have evidence that Coastcon was up to illegal activity but had no evidence he could produce.


 * Most likely these new users were Dreadmire fans drawn to the debate when they saw the issue being discussed on some of the non-Wikipedia fan sites. I have no sock puppets. A simple check of the IP addresses of all these Users will prove this. End of story. Quode on the other hand, joined Wikipedia for the sole purpose of deleting my Dreadmire-related articles. The pettiness continues. Enough said.--Cryogenesis 02:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)


 * You haven't formatted this case properly, so I have no idea what you are talking about. Please start the report again. It isn't that complex. Kil  o • T  19:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)