Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/CyberAnth

User:CyberAnth
;Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Happyme22 (talk) 05:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Evidence: CyberAnth and I met at the article Jeremiah Wright controversy. The user has repeatedly disagreed with myself and other page editors, going against concensus (see Talk:Jeremiah Wright controversy). He began a section at Talk:Jeremiah Wright controversy entitled POV pushing, where he accused myself and two other editors of being uncivil and partisan. I was upset, and responded, justifying my actions. In that message, I told the user that I was an experienced editor and pointed to two articles which I greatly aided in becoming featured: Ronald Reagan and Nancy Reagan. CyberAnth then began stalking me and followed me over to the Ronald Reagan page, tagging the article for POV and unbalance. He also went to the Nancy Reagan page, and added in a claim that Mrs. Reagan was addicted to prescription medication. He then began a discussion at the Talk:Ronald Reagan page called Hero worship, calling the article "sanitized" and that he will be "working to introduce such critical material in a scholarly manner."


 * After an edit war, User:Cryptographic hash came to the page and restored the POV and unbalanced tags. I reverted it, and then CyberAnth added them back again. It was later undone as well. Cryptographic hash then added in a very critical piece of President Reagan, which I reverted for WP:WEIGHT and WP:NPOV concerns. That edit was deduced at the talk page to also be in violation of WP:RELIABLE.


 * Prior to all this, all three, led by User:Ewenss, repeatedly went against concensus at the Jeremiah Wright controversy page. I reported CyberAnth at WP:WQA (see the page here) where specualtion of the three all being sockpuppets was brought up. So I put in a request at WP:RFCU, where the most damning piece of evidence was brought up: after an IP check, it was confirmed that they are indeed all the same person — see the results here.


 * While I was filing this report, User:Tiptoety dropped me a line and informed me that he, an admin, blocked User:CyberAnth citing the WP:RFCU results. I am now requesting that blocks are issued on the sockpuppets User:Ewenss, User:Cryptographic hash, and User:C.m.jones, because CyberAnth can simply go to his other three accounts and use them to complete his dirty work and disrupt concensus at multiple pages. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 05:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Conclusions

All socks blocked. GBT/C 07:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)