Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Damifb

User:Damifb

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

--PeterCantropus (talk) 11:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Damifb was blocked indefinitely for disruption (also in the Spanish wikipedia). When he still wasn't blocked, he created an article about himself that was finally deleted after this debate. The result was 5 to 1 for delete: that 1 vote for keep was by User:Paleofreak. User:Miotroyo also made some comments, in favor of keep, but still didn't vote (maybe to avoid obvious fraud).
 * Evidence

In that debate I accused User:Miotroyo and User:Paleofreak of being sockpuppets, and they didn't deny my accusations. In the Spanish Wikipedia, es:Usuario:Miotroyo was blocked for being es:Usuario:Damifb sockpuppet. In this diff you can see how he created User:Miotroyo talk page still logged in as User:Damifb. I should add that "Miotroyo" in Spanish means "My other self".

Here he lied and said that he was a co-worker of User:Damifb, so to explain the same IP and avoid blocking, but in his user page he states that he lives in Mexico City, while User:Damifb allegedly works at Newsweek Argentina.

As for User:Paleofreak, I'm having an argument with him over his article being deleted, and he accepts being the one who created the article (User:Damifb, that is). He also states there (in Spanish) that he got a job thanks to having an article about himself in Wikipedia. I don't think that's true, but still...

I don't know if admins are able to check the history of deleted pages, but if that could be done, you'll see that User:Damifb, User:Paleofreak and User:Miotroyo are the only ones that edited that article about himself (other than bots or minor edits), so it's pretty obvious they are the same person.


 * Comments


 * Conclusions
 * Paleofreak and Miotroyo blocked indefinitely. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  12:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)