Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Daniel Chiswick (2nd)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Daniel Chiswick

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Gdo01 16:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

User:Daniel Chiswick was blocked earlier for "personal attacks against other users" stemming from the user's obvious anti-European, pro-American bias. During the block's duration the user used several sockpuppets to get around the block: Suspected sock puppets/Daniel Chiswick.
 * Evidence

This username was created during Daniel's block. The puppetmaster has removed comments from the sock's page (a practice the master pursues often)and the master has put warnings on a user that the sock was edit warring with. The edit warring was on the History of Tamil Nadu article on which both the master and sock have the same POV and have the same specific insignificant issue with the article (master: sock:).

Listen "Gdo01", my block is over and yeah, so what, I made another account. Wow, that block was too long anyway. Also on Talk:History_of_Tamil_Nadu I wasn't trying to push a POV as another user who was not my second account agreed with me. How is replacing English with British POV when the article talks about something that took place after 1707? I am no longer blocked and I can have a second account if I want to, and if you would like I could even make a link on my page saying that is a second account. I understand you do not like me but stop watching my every move because it is really annoying, why don't you go bother somebody else instead of bothering me. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.
 * Comments


 * No, circumventing a block is expressly forbidden --Liπus the Turbogeek(contact me) 18:09, May 9, 2007
 * Eventhough, you may not have meant to do it this way but the presence of two of your accounts on a talk page can lead to vote stacking or "showing wider support of a viewpoint": Sock puppetry. Other than that, as said above, you created the username while blocked, a clear case of circumventing a block. Furthermore, none of the legitimate reason to have a sock on WP:SOCK apply to you:

So that means you have no legitimate reason for having another account.Gdo01 01:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Segregation and security - you seem to not care whether your accounts meddle in the same things as shown by you deleting comments on your other account, so you clearly intend to use both accounts for the same purpose
 * 2) Keeping heated issues in one small area - You've actually brought both your accounts into conflict with User:Venu62 so this is out.
 * 3) 'Role' accounts - you don't have an official sanction for this.
 * 4) Bots - not a bot
 * 5) Doppelganger accounts - doesn't apply either
 * Further, I will add that the user has personally attacked me (edit summary). Gdo01 01:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I did not mean to "Show Support" on that talk page and it was a mistake. I have already admited that was my second account and I would be happy to delete it if I could. If you want I could sign my main account in as my second account of that talk page, I would be more than happy to. Also that "Personal attack" was not directed at you, it was towards all the people who won't leave me alone and keep bothering me and watching my every move, you are one of the people but I ment in general. I am just trying to turn over a new leaf but people like you (Among others) will not let me and keep harassing me. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.

Also stop instigating people by trying to get them blocked and creating pages like this and watching people's every move which would cause a person to "Personally attack" you. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.
 * See my response at User talk:Jersyko. You still have not addressed the fact that you have no legitimate reasons (outlined above) to create a sockpuppet. As I wrote in the link, you can start a new leaf if you abide by the rules in WP:SOCK. Gdo01 01:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Obvious block evasion. Daniel Chiswick is blocked for a week, Andrew Steller indef blocked. During the one-week block, you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under any username or anonymous IP. Once the block expires, if you wish to exercise your right to vanish, I or any other admin would be happy to help you. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)