Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/DrATEasy

User:DrATEasy

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

 Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  18:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by


 * Evidence
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

None of these evidences show connection between DrATEasy and the others suspected sockpuppets. The evidence show that suspected sockpuppets have similar writing style but not with myself (DrATEasy which have different style). I've asked several people to add thier support the case for ATEasy article, they have created users and posted their comments - I did not create any users or enter these comments DrATEasy (talk) 19:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Then those accounts are meatpuppets. From WP:SSP: For the purposes of upholding policy, Wikipedia does not distinguish between meatpuppets and sockpuppets.  Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  20:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I have posted the link to this Articles for deletion/ATEasy in a Geotest Form and several people responded. I have no idea who they are other then that they are ATEasy users (and are using the Geotest M@gic form). I think you guys are more worried on policing Wikipedia then actually contributing to the KB (at least in this case). To this point I got no constructive comments. Anything in the article is inaccurate? I don’t think so. Please read the ATEasy article and the discussion  page before reaching to conclusions.DrATEasy (talk) 23:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The comments on the AfD are all very similar, and the suspected sockpuppets have either no other edits or very few, based around the same topic area.  Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  18:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments

I have to contend here with Stwalkerster as the only contributions to these accounts are the AFD.  D u s t i talk to me 19:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Meets the duck test : All socks indefinitely blocked and tagged accordingly. Sockmaster blocked one month for abusing mutiple accounts. GBT/C 13:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions