Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Durzatwink (2nd)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Durzatwink (2nd case)

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

contribs STYROFOAM☭1994 TALK 22:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

His edits are all in the same area of interest, are somewhat biased in favor of what he is writing about, and all of their styles of talking are very similar, as in here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. I also know that all of the previous persons mentioned have been blocked and linked to User:Rws killer, as in here and here. Each of them have all been created a few days right after the previous identity was blocked indefinitely. (see the account creation log). There is a triangle between me, User:Sanjay517, User:Nku pyrodragon, and when the last person got banned, User:Durzatwink took his place. Also see the previous user's sockpuppet file. Also, the checkuser IPs are confirmed (see here) checkuser case is confirmed by User:Allison
 * Evidence

I have made 3 cases on this so far; one was deleted immediately as a "test page" (so I discounted that one), and the other failed case didn't have enough evidence. So here I am with confirmed checkuser evidence that User:Nku pyrodragon=User:Durzatwink. contribs STYROFOAM☭1994 TALK 22:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments

Yes the third one. I am getting quite tired of showing all of my evidence that proves you wrong. This is obviously harassment. You are constantly accusing me of sockpuppetry and it is getting tiring. Please contact all of the people who proved that I am not a sockpuppt because a third case is just enough for me. Obviously this user enjoys harassing other users as you can see from all of his warns in his contribs. May I also add that he deleted many warns so you may want to check his deleted contribs. Thannks-- Durza Twink TALK 23:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

You may debate over this case. However, I will continue making good edits and warn/report vanadals. Bye-- Durza Twink TALK 23:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Look at the Checkuser evidence. This absolutely, once and for all proves my point. contribs STYROFOAM☭1994 TALK 23:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

DurzaTwink has already been indef blocked as a result of the CU. See here. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 03:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Archiving; user has already been indefinitely blocked (log). haz (talk) 08:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions