Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Eios1234

User:Eios1234

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 11:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

1, 2,
 * Evidence
 * Edits by Eios1234 to Urdu:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
 * Subsequent edits by User:68.110.238.158 to Urdu article :

1, 2.
 * Edits by Eios1234 to Talk:Fritzl case focusing on his "Jewish background":

.
 * Subsequent edit by User:68.110.238.158 to Talk:Fritzl case again centered on his "relegion":

I strongly beleive that User:Eios1234 has stopped logging in and is using anonymous login deleberately, in order to escape Wikipedia rules. User:68.110.238.158 started editing Urdu and Talk:Fritzl case immediately after User:Eios1234 stopped. User:Eios1234 has recied several warnings on his talk page. The edits to the Urdu article by both are the same, basically User:68.110.238.158 is "protecting" Eios1234's edits. See |Urdu article history. The edits to Talk:Fritzl case are specifically focused on Fritzl's religion and are anti-semetic in nature.
 * Comments

See the cotributions list for both of them. They are working on the same articles: Special:Contributions/Eios1234 Special:Contributions/68.110.238.158

User:68.110.238.158 has admitted to being an old user on my talk page:

No doubt in my mind that User:Eios1234 is sockpuppeteering as an anon in order to circumvent rules.


 * Conclusions

I believe that these accusations are heavy. Unfortunately in our dorm room, there is a single computer which is used by many people. While I do not know what the other users do while I am not here, I can only attest to the edits that I login and do with my username Eios1234. Beyond that I do not know what the computer is used for. Is there a way to possibly find out the IP address of my computer so I can verify my IP address is not the one that Deepak D'Souza is accusing me of having? Eios1234 (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Eios1234
 * Response
 * Comment Isn't it funny that you report me for a 3RR violation (btw, you havent read the rule properly) whereas I had warned annon user User:68.110.238.158 about it:, not you!!!!!! Thats one more coincidence on your part!!!--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 10:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I am glad that you have warned that user Deepak D'Souza but what I am more concerned about is your use of editing and reverting. I have noticed too when leaving comments on your page that that user also warned you about the reverts, it is probably because it is a problem that is taking a lot of time and patience from users trying to make constructive edits. I will admit your efforts to chase other users like this is very frustrating because my time can better be spent doing research.....
 * Response to response

I would also like to mention that User:Deepak D'Souza has a history of making these type of accusations. Please see the case involving Enigmatic1986 under section heading Situation, below is the cited case.


 * Hi Deepak D'Souza. :) I'm not an administrator, but I could try to help and talk with the user if you'd like. At this point, it seems that another person in the mix, such as myself, might not help the situation, but if clarity is ever needed, I wouldn't mind trying to explain and straighten out any confusion Enigmatic1986 may have. Cheers! -- Jamie  S93  11:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I personally see nothing innately wrong with him creating a new account if he wants to, or getting the current one deleted, as long as this is done appropriately. Once a new username is created, the previous one should not be used any longer, and the new account ought not to be used for any sort of abusive or remotely sock-puppetry purposes, of course. However, I am assuming that he has good intentions, especially if he suggested to start over or get a new username for the purpose of simply "starting fresh" or forgetting history. I don't think there would be any policy violation if he wanted to create a new account, or get his previous contributions removed. I'd suggest that he ask an administrator about the situation regarding getting his user account deleted, and also creating a new one if he wants to a new name to contribute under. -- Jamie  S93  16:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

I have asked Deepak D'Souza to use his time here on Wikipedia more constructively, I have also noted that another user has attempted to warn Deepak before about his constant reverts on the "Urdu" page. Again I am still very concerned about how Deepak D'Souza is using Wikipedia to chase other users. Eios1234 (talk) 17:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Eios1234


 * ✅ per Checkuser. Also  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 04:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

IP three months, master 1 week, new sock indef. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 13:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)