Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Emma woodhouse

User:Emma woodhouse

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

-- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Most edits of the two socks center around reverting unwanted changes to articles created by the sockpuppeteer. ,, ,.
 * Evidence


 * After seeing a confirmed checkuser, this edit suggests a blatant attempt to mislead. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:02, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Whoever originated this used user5 instead of socklinks :) ++Lar: t/c 22:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Is that bad? I used Twinkle.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 22:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Socklinks seems to be used by most, and it makes it easier for the CU if they are going to run a check (by 1 click per user to be checked) as it has the key link already embedded. However it doesn't populate the reason box with a backlink to the page so maybe there's a better one... see the talk of the SSP page? ++Lar: t/c 23:05, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

The information given warranted a check in my view. I leave it to your discretion what to do. ++Lar: t/c 22:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * ✅ that Emma woodhouse == Christy huddleston == Othelloiago ..., Emma is the sockmaster, so block the other two if behaviour warrants.
 * Also found two sleepers:
 * All blocked for being sockpuppets used in a deceptive manner.  MBisanz  talk 03:13, 16 December 2008 (UTC)