Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/FreddyKruger

User:FreddyKruger

 * Suspected sock puppeteer


 * Suspected sock puppets


 * Report submission by
 * Atlantabravz (talk) 17:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Evidence
 * Suspected puppetmaster began editing Bridge over Troubled Water with these edits:, , , and I kept reminding the user about Wiki's policies and placed warnings on the user's talkpage. User then started visiting other pages I have edited and undoing my edits . User also vandalized the userpage of another user: and  by removing article drafts. After warning puppetmaster, an anon IP (1st suspected sockpuppet) made the same controversial edits:  and  after puppetmaster was warned for edit warring and following Wiki policies. A second anon IP and suspected sockpuppet started making the same controversial edits to Bridge over Troubled Water:  and also went to another page I had recently edited to undo my changes:  and . For good measure, this second anon IP even made the same controversial edit to Bridge over Troubled Water and included in the edit summary that he was "Refraining from edit warning (sic).":  Suspected puppetmaster has now come back into the scene and engaged in talk on the article's discussion page in an attempt to justify the behavior: ;


 * Comments
 * Please remember to notify all accounts listed as possibly linked to the sock puppetry in question (instructions).

Well, I thought the bridge over troubled water controversy was behind us as we had discussed on the talk page. Atlantabravz should understand that my edits were not a personal attack against him/her. I was only trying to add something that I thought was of value. If it helps, I will apologize for offending him/her.

As for the anon IP's listed in the edit history. There is a total of seven listed there and I am pretty sure I was logged in with this account on any edits I made to the article.

In conclusion, I hope that this issue can be resolved quickly. If you check the edit history you will find that I made a couple of attempts to discuss the issue in the discussion page and on Atlantabravz talk page but he/she declined. It was only after the article had been locked that he/she put his/her views on the discussion page. I hope Atlantabravz will now finally put the issue behind him/her and we can move on. FreddyKruger (talk) 21:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

PS. is there a way I can report someone for harassment? ...just kidding


 * Conclusions
 * ✅ FreddyKruger already indef'ed. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  18:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)