Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/FunnyMunny


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:FunnyMunny

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Marskell 18:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Evidence


 * User:FunnyMunny arrived on Attribution/Poll and supported with just their second edit. Somewhat suspicious, but it is advertised at the top of the editing screen, so I just flagged it...
 * User:UnderTrade arrived on the poll five minutes later and supported with their first ever edit. Both become definitely suspect at this point.


 * Comments

Both accounts have been indef blocked as socks of User:Light current. --Akhilleus (talk) 04:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Possible. Unfortunately little evidence is available.  If they were sockpuppets, the master is probably a relatively established editor.  Since CheckUser cannot establish who that would be, further deliberation is probably wasted unless further evidence appears.  No point in blocking the accounts if they were single purpose.  --Iamunknown 17:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Likely, but sadly unprovable without a sock puppeteer. DanielFolsom |\T/|\C/|\U/|(Can you help me with my signature?) 01:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions