Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Greg Jungwirth

User:Greg Jungwirth

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

-- treelo talk 02:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Due to the persistence of this vandal in blanking user talkpages from various IPs I'm requesting that an autoblock be in place on the mentioned addresses. already has an autoblock in place thrugh use of the address for ban evasion and vandalism but as he uses a pool of IP addresses (and one from a public library though that already seems prone to use by vandals) all of the socks must have autoblocks in place in order to prevent further disruption. -- treelo talk 02:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Evidence

Not sure what you mean by "autoblocks". Autoblocks occur automatically when a logged-in user is hard-blocked. Do you mean you want a hard-block on all of these IPs? It seems only one user talk page is being vandalized - and even that fairly seldom. WP:RBI seems the better approach - or semi-protection if it gets more frequent. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I would want a hard-block on these IPs as clearly I've used the wrong term. More than one talkpage is vandalised by these IP addresses consistently. RBI seems the right choice to make to me over a hardblock and more permanent semi-prots for the talkpages should it continue as it'd pretty much kill the vandal's modus operandi of glory-seeking. This SSP case could easily be feeding the fire also, might come back to dealing with it with hard-blocking should RBI do nothing if not increase it. -- treelo talk 22:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Main user account has been indef blocked, and talk page protected. IPs have been blocked, where relevant (with a long-term block on the worst IP). Long term blocks on the other IPs is inappropriate as they appear to be dynamic. If issues continue then use WP:AIV or WP:RFPP accordingly.
 * Conclusions

Archiving because this is relatively stale by now. The public face of GBT/C 12:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)