Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Habitbroke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Habitbroke

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť  Talk to me or Need help? 02:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Evidence

All of the suspected sockpuppets have vandalized user_talk:Zzuuzz and often use the same words like fuck and other words that refer to genitalia and sexual body parts. Often uses symbols like ^ % $ # @ * in their "comments."

Proof 1 Proof 2 Proof 3 Proof 4 Proof 5 Proof 6 Proof 7 Proof 8 Proof 9 Proof 10 Proof 11


 * Comments
 * and are both sockpuppets of . Their style is rather distinctive, they seem to be unrelated to the other accounts. WjBscribe 03:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

There are at least three distinct regular vandals to my talk page. The 172. vandal is unique for vandalising the articles of Canadian politicians - eg Olivia Chow, Stéphane Dion, Svend Robinson. He doesn't like that I have protected the articles. This is an AOL IP - it can be changed within seconds, but can also remain the same for hours.

The  ... vandal (81.102.15.210 etc) is another vandal I've upset after I stopped them vandalising User talk:Irishguy and User talk:Jimbo Wales. I am not sure if Habitbroke is the same vandal, or a copycat. The IP range used by this vandal is very large and can change with each edit. -- zzuuzz(talk) 15:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Habitbroke was insta-blocked, and the  ... vandal seems to be gradually retiring. The 172 vandal has had all his vandalism targets semi-protected and will be back in July. Mr Oompapa - what conclusion can you make? The other vandals are generally one-offs and not a long term problem. Case closed I think? -- zzuuzz(talk) 15:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


 * All named accounts are indef blocked, and the IPs appear to be dynamic (two are AOL), so long-term blocks on them would likely be pointless and do collateral damage. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)