Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hatewatcher

User:Hatewatcher

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

SLSB  talk ER 14:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

is an abusive sockpuppet of being used to upload Image:Contract 0081.jpg, an image which constitutes unreferenced negative information concerning a living person, in violation of WP:BLP, and which is identical to Image:Kevin strom contract.jpg, uploaded by Hatewatcher, which was speedily deleted pursuant to CSD G10. Itzwiki has also placed the WP:BLP violating image in just as Hatewatcher did. John254 15:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC) Report submitted by SLSB. Fixed by John. SLSB  talk ER 15:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Evidence

This is simply false. I do not know the username Itzwiki, have never used this user name, and proof of that can easily be had from our IP addresses. I have, originally, registered another username which used my real name but that was years ago, and I stopped using it for privacy reasons. Itzwiki is someone else. HateWatcher 20:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * The diffs by John are damning. One thing is for certain: Itzwiki must be a sock puppet of somebody.  His only edits have been to this single article. Shalom Hello 14:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The diffs by John (whoever John is) are not my problem. I don't care what you say, I am not Itzwiki, I have never been Itzwiki, and I have never even heard of Itzwiki.  Look at the IP addresses.  Let's have them out in the open.  These childish accusations are nonsense.  HateWatcher 05:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * There has been ZERO evidence presented, and in fact the case is simply wrong. I am requesting a speedy closure of this absurd and ridiculous false accusation. HateWatcher 22:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

I think these are fairly suspicious for at least being associates, if not sockpuppets. However, at this point I'm going to strongly warn Itzwiki regarding WP:BLP, and close the case there. If there is further evidence of these accounts tag-teaming or being used abusively, I'd suggest going to checkuser (unless it's very clear-cut). MastCell Talk 17:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions