Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hemanshu

User:Hemanshu

 * Suspected sock puppeteer


 * Suspected sock puppets


 * Report submission by
 * — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Evidence
 * (reverting my reversion of Hemanshu's
 * (random month combinations in )
 * (random month combinations in )
 * (random month combinations in )
 * remaining edits include complete removal of month tags in 2013–2022, which I tend to agree with, even though some of the tags are specially linked from the headers.
 * Hemanshu's similar edits in include 8 October, 27 October, 28 October, 28 October, 28 October, 28 October,  October 30, October 30, 30 December, and 30 December.


 * Comments
 * Hemanshu is now blocked for edit warring on 2012


 * WF's first edits were to his monobook, which is now identical to Hemanshu's. Suggest CU, though it admittedly looks pretty obvious to me. Wizardman  18:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree that a block might be considered on this evidence, but since the case is before Arbcom, a CU should be run. The CUs may decline to do a check if Wikipedianforever is already blocked. See my submission at Requests for checkuser/Case/Hemanshu. In any case, I think the behavioral evidence here is not good enough for an indef. EdJohnston (talk) 19:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * ✅ both behaviorally and by checkuser data. There is also what appears to be a lot of other suspect activity as well, which may or may not be connected - I'm discussing this with Coren. FT2 (Talk 19:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Hemanshu has been desysopped by Dungodung by request of the ArbCom pending resolution of an ArbCom motion . Stifle (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * He has also requested RTV. Stifle (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * He didn't ask for RTV, he asked for his account to be deleted, which is a technical impossibility. — Rlevse • Talk  • 03:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)