Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/I Hate CAPTCHAS

User:I Hate CAPTCHAS

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Libro0 (talk) 01:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Identical revision to 1980 Topps, 1981 Topps, 1982 Topps, 1983 Topps, 1984 Topps, 1970s Topps et.al.
 * Evidence

I have tried to engage in dialog with this user. Yet their only action is to remain stubborn and unwilling to comply with wikipedia standards. Insists on reverting to bad grammar and diction in articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Libro0 (talk • contribs)
 * Comments
 * has also restored the text added by these users. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 02:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * One of the suspected sockpuppets, is also one of the names mentioned in Suspected sock puppets/Bolly Nickers. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 02:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I would also like to submit this anonymous id as having been used by the above: 213.220.223.171. Libro0 (talk) 19:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * That IP address has now been blocked as a Tor node. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 19:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Lies. This is all lies as part of Libro0's campaign of harassment and intimidation. Just look at his work as it speaks for itself. --I Hate CAPTCHAS (talk) 14:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I suspect that User:Libro0 may be a sockpuppet of banned user User:Tecmobowl. The editing pattern is similar. --Baseball Card Guy (talk) 11:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Your (Baseball Card Guy) edits start May 08 while Tecmobowl was banned in July 07. How exactly do you know about this user if you are new? Libro0 (talk) 12:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

A connection with Suspected sock puppets/Bolly Nickers

One thing mentioned in that case is the "delete" !votes in the following AFD discussions: The users with "delete" !votes on both articles all named in the Bolly Nickers sockpuppetry case, with two exceptions: one is who also used "we" instead of "I" in the discussions:   a similarity with other users mentioned in that case; the other "delete" in both AFDs was from : note that  is listed in both SSP cases, and the only previous edit by I Hate CAPTCHAS in the Wikipedia: namespace is on "Images and media for deletion":  is similar to an edit by  (in the same discussion):  (again the use of the word "we" instead of "I", and that Also We Brief is another user listed in the Bolly Nickers case). Also this edit on WP:ANI:. If Wooly Musher and Also We Brief are socks (see Suspected sock puppets/Bolly Nickers), it is likely that I Hate CAPTCHAS is another. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 19:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/List of U.S. railfan jargon
 * Articles for deletion/List of UK railfan jargon (3rd nomination)

I believe this user has reverted to sock puppetry to avoid the standard discussion methods for arriving at consensus for article content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Libro0 (talk • contribs)
 * Conclusions

Please see the results of the UserCompare tool.. This provides rather conclusive evidence. Steve Crossin (talk) (review) 04:51, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I believe Libro0 has reverted to sock puppetry as part of his scheme of lies and dirty tricks to avoid the standard discussion methods for arriving at consensus for article content. --I Hate CAPTCHAS (talk) 14:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * All blocked indefinitely. GBT/C 19:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)