Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jacob Peters

User:Jacob Peters

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

C.J. Griffin (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

He clearly has a pro-communist agenda and is deleting sourced information. He is also citing some of the same dubious sources he has in the past. See the revision history of the articles Russian Civil War, List of massacres‎, Great Purge, Genocides in history and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia‎ for evidence of this.
 * Evidence

At the least, the charge of "C.J. Griffin" is without evidence. If this is what he does on a regular basis towards those editors that make contributions contrary to his prejudices, then he should be sanctioned for abusive conduct. Interestingly, "C.J. Griffin" seems more interested in censoring views he disagrees with rather than actually exposing real sockpuppets. His charge of a "pro-communist" agenda is particularly bizarre. The claim that I have used "dubious sources" is at the least slanderous when almost all of my contributions thus far have incororated scholarly sources. It's regrettable that "C.J. Griffin" has to engage in such infantile games rather than trying to make constructive contributions to this encyclopedia. Gulijan (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * Too bad for "Gulijan" (aka Jacob Peters) that every other time I've reported his sockpuppetry he's been penalized for it. Just look at the edits of the sockpuppeteer (Jacob Peters) and the sockpuppet ("Gulijan") and you can clearly see the similarities (i.e. that he's a Communist POV pusher). It's also a lie to claim that I regularly report editors I disagree with for sockpuppetry. Looking over my contributions will prove this is not the case. Notice that he didn't say a word about his deletion of materials with scholarly citations. Other editors have also been reverting his edits as you can see on the articles I've provided in the evidence section.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 04:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Looking at the contributions history for both of them they haven't been editing the same articles.Cryo921 (talk) 10:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, they have. Peters's sockpuppets have consistently hit these articles. Worth a checkuser, at any rate. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 15:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Concerning the allegations of this "Moreschi", I've checked the contributions of the user in concern, and his claim that the user has consistently edited the same articles is at the least inaccurate. It's interesting that while "C.J. Griffin accuses me of "deletion of materials with scholarly citations", it is in fact he who has been guilty of this. The allegation of "C.J. Griffin" of a "Communist POV pusher" is bizarre, to say the least. Interestingly, it is he who hosts a web site entitled "Red Holocaust". It appears that he is not concerned with sanctioning those abusing Wikipedia policy, but is merely determined to punish those whose views do not conform to his prejudices.
 * Gulijan (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I regret very much that Gulijan made the same revert five times on 3 February on Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia‎. All the time he tries to add parts which do not fit in with the article, because they are extremely POV, and seem to have the obvious intention to give the impression that trying the Red Khmer is undesirable. As I (like others) have been working hard to make this a good and objective article, this hurts. Paul kuiper NL (talk) 00:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Interestingly enough, this "Gulijan" just made an edit to the Richard Pipes article adding a "controversy" section (which I just reverted). Is it a coincidence that another confirmed Jacob Peters sock by the name of "Hadjin" made similar edits to an article on another historian that specialises in the crimes of Communism (Robert Conquest)? See for yourselves: "Gulijan" is clearly another Jacob Peters sock. You'd have to be blind not to see it.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 00:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * What is your reason for reverting the Alexander Parvus edit, is it simply because you suspect a sockpuppet or because you suspect a "pro-communist agenda"? Questioning81 (talk) 03:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The former. Vandals are not allowed to edit wikipedia.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 04:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Requests for checkuser/Case/Jacob Peters came back confirmed: user blocked indefinitely. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 09:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)