Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jaydjenkins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Femmina
(blocked indefinitely)
 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

--Oakshade 06:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Report submission by:

User Femmina (now blocked for trolling) has a crusade against blogs and started the Articles for deletion/Tony Pierce (a blogger) which was so ridden with sockpuppets, vandals and trolls, Administrator Deskana had to start a brand new AfD that was protected from IP only and new users accounts. That is this AfD.
 * Evidence

On that first AfD, before Femmina was blocked, they fervently responded to every "keep" vote.

In the new AfD, I noticed Jaydjenkins attacked every "keep" vote with the same mannor. Their contributions log only shows a total of 9 edits on two other articles before this AfD. . When I placed a Possible SPA Account notice in their name, the person responded with language that suggests they are very familiar with Wikipedia regulations, even though the person only logs 9 previous edits total.

As for User:69.213.81.114 and User:Binsk2, they kept on erasing the notice that Femmina was blocked on the first AfD.

I suspect SPA Account user: Butholer is the same person as they immediately created an account and voted "delete" on another AfD for a blogger.


 * Comments

User:Binsk2 and User:Jaydjenkins now indef-blocked as sockpuppets of Femmina (based on edit patterns). User:Butholer blocked under WP:USERNAME. I've left the IP address alone, as there hasn't been an edit from there in over three days, and I don't want to inadvertently block a future editor. | Mr. Darcy talk 02:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Conclusions