Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jjonjonjon

User:Jjonjonjon

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 03:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Significant disruption at Articles for deletion/Heather Dylan, usure at this point whether it's sock or meat puppetry.
 * adding, while she's not a pure SPA, there is something bizarre going on as evidenced here where she reverted herself for vandalism and then 'complained' about it. Something's fishy. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 04:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Additional evidence
 * It appears that the accounts of User:Sandyche3kzl0l, User:Joojoobee39, User:Moomooocow8, User:Kellykettles and User:Maryslambchopdinner were all created between 19:02 and 19:28 on the 4th of June. In each case, a keep !vote was made to the Afd, which TravellingCari has stated above, within the first two edits of the new accounts and, in a lot of the cases, within the first few minutes of the accounts. Each of the accounts suspected made a keep !vote all within the same forty or so minutes even though the Afd had gone live for five/six hours and yet only four !votes were made in those first few hours. All of the new accounts, with the exception of User:Kellykettles created their userpage the edit before or the edit after their !vote was made.
 * After I had made a comment, in a discussion with User:Joojoobee39 on Talk:Heather Dylan about how Heather Dylan redirects to Dylan Bierk on imdb.com, a few hours later User:Jjonjonjon adds a PROD tag to the Dylan Bierk article, with User:Kerrylionberry adding a support PROD tag less than a half an hour later. And then on various talkpages, User:Jjonjonjon and User:Kerrylionberry have removed parts or even blanked out comments made by others especially comments which question the reliablility of sources of the Heather Dylan article. AngelOfSadness  talk  11:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

As I've stated in the talk (discussion) page for TravellingCari, I am not a 'puppet'. I will defend my revert by stating that I was experimenting with my preferences, and clicked on some gadgets while not knowing what they were. I think the gadget is called Tickle or something like that, it marked my edit as vandalism. I took a quick glance at it, and thought TravellingCari marked my addition as vandalism. So I undid it. I will apologize for any confusion involving this, but as I said I am new to the gadgets and I am sure that's what caused it. Please take me off of this list. Thank you! Kerrylionberry (talk) 05:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments

I've blocked } for 12 hours, not for puppetry but for repeated vandalism and personal attacks, etc. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 03:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * User:Gwen Gale indef-blocked Jjonjonjon on June 6. None of this editor's suspected socks have been blocked, but none have edited since June 5, so we don't know if they are still active. EdJohnston (talk) 04:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Kerrykettles and Kerrylionberry both made attacks on the same user, almost simultaneously ( and ). I've warned them both, but IMO this is definate sock-puppetry. — Pek, on behalf of Tivedshambo (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Follow-up. Following further abuse from Kellykettles, I've switched to my admin account and indef blocked this user. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 14:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * All appear to have an obsession with herpes, which was the master's favorite form of personal attack/vandalism. They all but confirmed socking with your last two diffs. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 14:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I've now blocked Kerrylionberry for sockpuppetry as well. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 14:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * So what's next, how does this proceed, or does it. Socks have mostly quieted save for the initial burst. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 14:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll keep this page open for a while, in case anyone else has anything to say. Also, I've got my eye on another account, that may be related, but until I have firmer evidence I won't name for the time being. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 15:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, got it. Please let me know if there's anything else you need me to do. I am watching the page. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 16:06, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Based on contribs, it's evident that all of these accounts are sockpuppets or single-use accounts. I don't think they will edit again, but I believe in formalities, so I will ask Travellingcari to finish the job. Yechiel (Shalom) 14:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Since all the accounts listed here have been blocked, and the evidence appears strong, I'm closing the report. EdJohnston (talk) 17:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC)