Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Justinmarley

User:Justinmarley

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * (self identified)
 * (self identified)
 * (self identified)
 * (self identified)

-- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 17:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Created new account for sole purpose of giving the appearance of a "consensus" for his bad editing practices. Extremely obvious sock, with same inability to properly sign posts, the same tendency to create a new topic just to reply to a comment, and being an SPA who suddenly pops in to support this editor's point of view with absolutely no other edits but making remarks to support Justin. Note, from the editing history of Liaison psychiatry, the only article Justinmarley has an interest in, it is clear he edits from at least two IP addresses, as noted above. Both IPs have only edited that article, making the exact same edits as Justinmarley, putting in the same content removed before and always followed up by Justinmarley continuing the same edits when he remembers to log in.
 * Evidence

I have used two computers for the purposes of editing, one in London and the other in Sheffield. There have been occasions when I have edited without logging in - but that is simply because I have overlooked this in my early edits, although as I have become more familiar with the system I have become accustomed to the routine. Indeed I have used my real name on the account, which emphasises the conviction I have in my contributions. The allegation however is that I have created a false account - namely that of Plasmon. It should be a simple enough matter for the location of Plasmon's computer to be identified. There are two additional possibilities. Firstly that Plasmon can be contacted directly. I presume that there is an e-mail address contained within the Wikipedia account. Secondly if Plasmon has given identity details in the registration process these can be verified independently. Justinmarley (talk) 04:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)justinmarley
 * Evidence


 * Check users are done by actually tracing the IPs of the computers, not by relying on an editor's statements. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 05:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I would like an independent arbitration of this case. If possible I would like someone to trace the locations of the computers as has been done with wikipedia before. I would also like the independent arbiter to initiate an investigation of Collectonian for what i consider to be abuse of the Wikipedia process. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinmarley (talk • contribs) 05:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments

The unique way of signing posts is very convincing, it's very unique and I've never seen it before. Plus, the other evidence. I'm blocking Plasmons indef and warning Justinmarley. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 11:51, 27 July 2008 (UTC)...Update; CU shows Justinmarly and Plasmons are from different countries. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 18:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions