Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/KellyAna

User:KellyAna

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Bleek25 (talk) 11:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Please see the Las Vegas edit history. These 2 users accounts were started less that 24 hours apart.at first kellyana was putting the same information on the page. Then so he or she would avoid the 3RR rule Irish0128 started putting the same info on the page.
 * Evidence

Also look at these edits both User:KellyAna 1,2,and 3 and User:IrishLass0128 1,and 2 did they are exactly the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleek25 (talk•Bleek25 (talk) 19:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

User:KellyAna has stated that this is the second time he or she has been accused of being a sockpuppet.This proves that I 'm not the only one that belives that he or she is a sockpuppet.Bleek25 (talk) 19:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I believe these 2 accouts are socks.Bleek25 (talk) 11:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Reply. I've offered, as has KellyAna for a check user to be run many times. We both came here approximately the same day for the EJ Wells and Samantha Brady, Colleen Brady, and Santo DiMera articles .  We both come from the same external website that supports the couple (along with Antigone28, Perfectlovee, ForbiddenLove, and I'm one of the IP addresses before understanding how to get an account) and were asked by the administrator of that website to come over and help.  As the request to help came from the admin of our site to help with a page about the couples our website supports, and we are both active members, we jumped in to help her.  I then moved on to other Days of our Lives articles and expanded into other areas.  There are several articles I don't touch that Kelly works on (the Survivor articles being a big one).  There are articles I work on that she has no interest in, particularly my home town related articles of Garden Grove, West Garden Grove, California, and Pacifica High School.
 * Several people are putting the same content on the Las Vegas page, DJS24, Tj21, and others, Bleek is the one removing it and because Kelly and I work on the same Days of our Lives pages (we are both registered members of the Wikipedia Soaps Project) we made our way to other similar pages television related. Feel free to run a check user or what ever is necessary to clear this up.  In reality Bleek25 is upset that he's been warned over 3RR and people aren't respecting his/her abbreviated version of a plot line and this is his retaliation to me reporting his 3RR violation yesterday.  Thank you for your time. IrishLass (talk) 14:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * While the two accounts do share similar interests in soap operas, I believe, as with most genuine sock puppetry cases, that it would have been evident long before now. KellyAna even put through a successful change of username ... why do that if you were a sockpuppet? I think this is just motivated by an editing dispute. OK, I'm a little biased because I've been helpful to both of these users. But I'd really like to see more of the classic sock evidence (very similar writing quirks, not being online at the same time a lot), before I even consider this. Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm re-listing this case since it was incorrectly attached to another, unrelated case. --Mosmof (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * There need to be diffs to clearly show such an alleged relation as required in the instructions. Otherwise, I support dismissing this for lack of evidence. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I just found this. Am I supposed to reply/comment/defend myself over this?  (If I wanted to I could make the same accusation about Bleek25) or am I just supposed to wait for the decision.  After 6 months here, in the last two weeks because of the Las Vegas article, I've been accused twice of being some puppeteer of another user. I don't control anyone, isn't that what a puppeteer does?  What exactly am I supposed to do to refute these false accusations?  KellyAna (talk) 03:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply to new accusations. I was accused by someone who was a sock and has been blocked.  That means the accusation was questionable in the first place because they were only accusing me because I accused them there was no previous report on me.  And those 5 edits are just reverts of the content you removed, not 5 identical edits. KellyAna (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Dismissing case. They just look like two editors interested in the same topic to me. Also note the submitted filed a days-old 3RR on Kelly that was dismissed as stale. Suggest an eye be kept out for further such action. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 02:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions