Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kitia (2nd)

User:Kitia

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

edg ☺ ☭ 10:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Evidence
 * User:December 21, 2012 reopens a WP:DRV to restore Betsy Baker, the same topic Kitia had been confirmed running two other sockpuppets in a previous DRV opened by Kitia. December 21's opening comment: "I would pretty much go along with Kitia's reason in the previous DRV."
 * Similar articles edited
 * Both have frequent edits to articles about years, such as Deaths in 2007
 * Both have multiple edits to Algiers  and Khartoum
 * Both edit war in American Pie, inserting large, previously deleted tracts of WP:OR
 * Sock account created shortly after puppeteer blocked for sockpuppetry.
 * Kitia more or less announces intent to create sock accounts here, so expect more
 * User:December 21, 2012 nominated Joseph Priestley House, which s/he has made zero edits to at WP:FAC. However, Kitia started the article. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 17:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I just looked it over and thought it was reasonably well written, so I nominated it. i guess I'll have to do a bit of reasearch. December 21, 2012 (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * User:December 21, 2012 seems an obvious WP:USERNAME vio as confusing. --Jack Merridew 11:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Reported per your suggesion, thanks. But I don't want the name retired as this editor will pop up with another name and create more disruption. I want it blocked. / edg ☺ ☭ 11:44, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Followup: the request was dismissed as not sufficiently inappropriate to warrant a block. I don't really want to persue the name issue anyway, but thanks for the suggestion. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, but isn't this for when people use multiple accounts to edit abusively. As far as I know I haven't done that. Please tell me if I did. If my name is such a problem I will create another account. December 21, 2012 (talk) 23:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Votestacking and edit warring are sockpuppet abuse. There's evidence of both accounts being used to do the same things, and creating yet another account is only going to result in it being blocked along with any other sockpuppets, if this SSP report does conclude that you are a sockpuppet of Kitia. --Core desat 07:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have not votestacked, and my only edit warring was mostly on stuff other Wikipedias agree with. I only reverted the closure of the Betsy Baker nom because too little Wikipediand contributed. December 21, 2012 (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

The December user is a block evading sock, that and the other issues mentioned are plenty to block indef. Blocked. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions