Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover (10th)

User:Komodo lover

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

CBFan (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Continual vandalism of Walking with Monsters and List of episodes in Prehistoric Park is EXACTLY the same as all of his previous accounts, with him insisting that it has to be the way he puts it because "people will get confused".
 * Evidence

Continously removes any comments in his user talk page, insisting that he "has to be a loner". Of course, the REAL reason is because he doesn't want to be found out, but that is not going to happen. Whilst I am aware that users are allowed to blank their talk pages, and it is their right to have what they want, Komodo Lover does not, in my book, get these privliages, because in the past he has abused them strongly. I think a page protection would also be of benefit as a result. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CBFan (talk • contribs) 17:38, 25 April, 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments

See also: SSP cases:
 * Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover (2nd)
 * Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover (3rd)
 * Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover (4th)
 * Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover (5th)
 * Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover (6th)
 * Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover (7th)
 * Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover (8th)
 * Suspected sock puppets/Komodo lover (9th)

CU results (from early December 2007):


 * Requests for checkuser/Case/Komodo lover

I re-opened that checkuser request on 30 April to add the above two suspected socks, and asked for any ideas; for instance, whether a rangeblock was likely to work. EdJohnston (talk) 01:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

See also: Long term abuse/Komodo lover.


 * Conclusions


 * User:Gb indef blocked User:Mr. Loner, and User:EdJohnston indef blocked User:Total Ignorent boy based on the behavioral evidence. EdJohnston (talk) 01:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)