Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kshatriya knight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Kshatriya knight

 * Evidence
 * 28 July 2006 and 29 July 2006 see Kshatriya knight's user page set up by Kshatriya knight, 58.104.42.131, and 58.104.25.139, who are probably all Kshatriya knight — compare the User contributions of 58.104.42.131, and 58.104.25.139 to those of Kshatriya knight.
 * In the midst of all those edits by the above three editors setting up Kshatriya knight's user page is Supreme eye's sole User contribution: the awarding of the Defender of the Wiki Barnstar to Kshatriya knight.
 * Supreme eye ostensibly awards the Defender of the Wiki Barnstar to Kshatriya knight "for being the defender of truth," language similar in tone and content to Kshatriya knight's motto "truth alone triumphs" and his description of his own mission as "eradicating nescience and ignorance from wikipedia articles, and to promote truth and protect articles from being vandalised".


 * Comments
 * Creating a sockpuppet to give oneself a barnstar is, for lack of a better word, lame. Creating a sock puppet to give oneself a barnstar "for being the defender of truth" can be found floating several kilometres above the height of hypocrisy. You'll run into the corpse of irony on your way up. SiflOlly 22:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah it was pretty lame :P, but it didnt really say that you couldnt post a barnstar for yourself and it made the image of the defender of truth look betta. its been taken off and now i know how sad it was lol

Not sockpuppets; possible just logged out. Iola k ana |T 19:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)