Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Lalacool


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Lalacool
(the person behind Lalacool)
 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence

This user signed today to revert Winter War article. This clearly reminds us of User:Lalacool, User:Daborhe which both are banned. Both only revert information to more pro-Soviet POV without leaving any notes or discussing the issue, but just rather rv them rudely.
 * Comments

I can't anyway proof that it is Lalacool / the person behind Lalacool as it was a sock puppet too. The sure thing is that this is a sock puppet but who is the bigger evil behind this? I'm sorry to speculate but he might be User:Irpen or User:Fisenko or User:SuperDeng, sorry if neither aren't. There were also two other these kind of sock puppets with "similiar names", I can't recall them now but I try to find them. They both also had simple messages on their userpage and talk page, just like Bordddf.

EDIT: I found the similiar accounts with similiar messages on user and talk page. Both reverts on similiar articles; User:Pinkbluty and User:Bluechipser. --Pudeo (Talk) 20:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Check this admin note, I believe this has something do with it, or are very similiar.


 * Conclusions

You're best to take this to WP:RFCU. Iola k ana • T 21:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Keep watching these users; you're going to have to come up with more evidence of abuse and similarities of editing patterns. I'm sure that they are socks of someone just based on their contribution pattern and obvious experience with WP policies, but I don't see anything linking them to Lalacool, nor do I see any violations of WP:SOCK. I don't think RFCU will investigate because there isn't any obvious abuse involved, and these accounts seem like quick throw-away accounts without substantial edit histories (Pinkbluty and Bluechipser only have contributions 9/16 and 9/17, nothing since then). Neil916 (Talk) 06:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)