Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Lauracbr

User:Lauracbr

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Beloved Freak  22:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

The above users have been inserting the same uncited information regarding the children of Peregrine Cavendish into the article Peregrine Cavendish, 12th Duke of Devonshire. This information has been repeatedly reverted by other editors as it contradicts reliable sources.
 * Evidence

On the 25th May 2008, User:Lauracbr edited the article Peregrine Cavendish, 12th Duke of Devonshire (diff), adding information about three extra children of the subject. The information was removed and reinserted by User:Kellymoney on the 26th of May (diff). Further information added by User:64.7.190.196 and User:64.7.191.163 (diff). Information readded on 29th May (and other info inexplicably removed) by User:Barbarasdf (diff). More added by User:64.7.191.211 on 31st May (diff). Information inexplicably removed by User:Tooby89 on 2nd June (diff) who then added the unsupported information about the children (diff). Information readded on 5th June by User:Tooby89 (diff). Again by User:Tooby89 on 7th June (diff). User:Saramap on 10th June (diff). User:Davidroths on 12th, 15th and 17th of June (diff, diff, diff) User:Tooby89 again today, 21st June (diff) and then User:Amber1986 (diff, diff).

Every single one of these IP addresses and user accounts, without exception, has made all of its edits to the affected article and not a single edit elsewhere.
 * Comments

Given the persistent disruption, and the fact that Peregrine Cavendis is a living person, I will request indefinite semi-protection. It goes without saying that all of these sockpuppets should be indef-blocked. Yechiel (Shalom) 01:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Blocked names indef, IPs 3 months. But I think the real master is still out there. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 23:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Conclusions