Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Marion143

User:Marion143

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets

Spellcast 17:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Report submission by

Obvious sock puppet of Marion105 who has been blocked twice for adding deliberate factual errors in Tupac Shakur discography. In fact, every edit Marion143 has made is adding deliberate errors to articles. This is all after the original account, Marion105, was blocked for a week. Spellcast 17:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Evidence

It's backwards, 105 would be the sockpuppeteer and 143 the sock. But in addition to that the block on 105 expired on 17 Oct and 143 didn't become active til 20 Oct. Where is the vio of sock policy? I see no vote stacking, collusion, edit warring, etc. 105 hasn't edited in awhile. I see past vandalism, but not sock violations. If there are some, provide diffs. Rlevse 18:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Yeah I realised it was backwards after submitting this. I was on Marion143's userpage and when I used twinkle to submit this, there was a field called "Sockpuppet" which you had to fill in. I put in his first account, Marion105, but I should have made the report using the oldest account. Anyway, my point is that shouldn't Marion143 be blocked for vandalism after a recent release from block? His only edits after being unblocked on October 17 is adding deliberate false information. Spellcast 19:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

My guess is 143 doesn't realize he can still use the 105 account. As such, this isn't blockable sock puppetry as they aren't editing at the same time. Now if he starts using both and they jointly disrupt, vote stack, etc, they we have a sock case that is blockable. I'm blocking 143 for vandalism at this point for 48 hours. Let's monitor and see what else happens. Leaving case open for now. Rlevse 20:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Thanks for blocking him. I only brought this up here because my block request to AIV was declined. Spellcast 20:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * He's committed more vandalism since then, so it was an easier decision. I'll leave this open for a few days and if nothing else comes up, then close it. Rlevse 01:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)