Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mdsummermsw

User:Mdsummermsw

 * Suspected sockpuppeteer


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Report submission by

Soccermeko (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

At Articles for deletion/Lovechild (Nicole Wray album) Delete, Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:08, 19 February 2008 Delete as nom, Cloudz679 (talk) 19:46, 19 February 2008 Delete per nom, Speedy delete per CSD G4 if applicable. Icarus (talk) 21:19, 19 February 2008
 * Evidence

They change the message just a little so that they would not be suspected.

Time and time again they have voted to remove Nicole Wray pages. They delete things together after they have convently been provided reliabe sources and references. They have tried to get rid of the Nicole Wray fans and use false information to describe Nicole Wray. Soccermeko (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

At the Nicole Wray discography 16:29, 13 February 2008 Mdsummermsw (Talk | contribs) (11,701 bytes) (Please explain the inclusion of unreleased albums and unsourced chart positions) I have provide more than enough sources, to prove what stays and goes.

Mdsummermsw has contested the deletion of "Nicole Wray's fourth studio album" more than once not because of reliable sources either ,but because he did not like it. Soccermeko (talk)

Cloudz679 has done the same.

They worked together everytime to put an end to Nicole's page like (Lovechild, Elektric Blue Sampler, Fantasia Lovechild EP, Lovechild EP, and her mixtapes. This was deleted not because it didn't have enough sources, its because they did not like Nicole Wray or her pages. The reason why they have not deleted the profile Nicole Wray is because they have not thought of anything good to use as an excuse to delete it. Soccermeko (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments

Not only this, they have blamed innocent users of something that is not true. More will be provide shortly Soccermeko (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC) A few sections of our edit histories:
 * Based on the comments by Soccermeko, I am unsure at this time if this is a frivolous accusation, a genuine belief that sock puppetry is involved or a belief that our editing is not being done in good faith. I have requested clarification from Soccermeko before responding in detail. - Mdsummermsw (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have just placed notices re this case on the talk pages of the three suspected socks for their information and/or comments. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I find the evidence on this page to indicate that myself and Mdsummermsw have been voting to remove unverified content. I can confirm I have been contesting content at various Nicole Wray-related pages in line with WP:A and WP:RS. There is no evidence, in my opinion, that any author has deleted content due to "not liking it". Further there is no evidence provided by OP here that false information has been used to describe Nicole Wray by any user other than himself/herself. Cloudz679 (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * All this seems like that old "they deleted my page, now I'm mad and I'm going to get my revenge!" thing. I voted on your page's afd and even tagged one of them for it, because they were not in accordance with Wiki policies. It's simple. You can't just say "its because they did not like Nicole Wray or her pages.", that's not true, I don't even know her, how can I dislike her? And it doesn't matter if I like a page or not, I must judge whether or not it is in accordance with our policies. Instead of wasting our time with unconstructive accusations, why don’t you spend some time learning how to write a good article? In addition, I have participated on various afd debates, just check on my user contributions. It’s not only with Nicole Wray-related articles. Victao lopes (talk) 18:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not even your page. I agree time would be better spent writing articles in accordance with wikipedia policies. Cloudz679 (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Mdsummermsw left the sockpuppet case not on Victao lopes' page. Basketball  110   what famous people say  01:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not even your page. I agree time would be better spent writing articles in accordance with wikipedia policies. Cloudz679 (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Mdsummermsw left the sockpuppet case not on Victao lopes' page. Basketball  110   what famous people say  01:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

19:16	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 19:18	February 1, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:18	February 1, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:18	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 19:34	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 19:35	February 1, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:37	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 19:40	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 19:42	February 1, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:49	February 1, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:50	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 20:04	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 20:06	February 1, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:07	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 20:09	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 20:11	February 1, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:16	February 1, 2008	Victao lopes 18:10	February 6, 2008	Victao lopes 18:12	February 6, 2008	Mdsummermsw 18:32	February 6, 2008	Mdsummermsw 18:34	February 6, 2008	Victao lopes 18:36	February 6, 2008	Victao lopes 18:47	February 6, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:02	February 6, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:03	February 6, 2008	Victao lopes 19:04	February 6, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:06	February 6, 2008	Victao lopes 19:07	February 6, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:08	February 6, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:10	February 6, 2008	Victao lopes 16:29	February 7, 2008	Mdsummermsw 16:29	February 7, 2008	Icarus3 16:30	February 7, 2008	Mdsummermsw 16:43	February 7, 2008	Mdsummermsw 16:44	February 7, 2008	Cloudz679 16:45	February 7, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:03	February 7, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:03	February 7, 2008	Victao lopes 20:16	February 7, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:57	February 11, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:57	February 11, 2008	Victao lopes 19:58	February 11, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:38	February 11, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:38	February 11, 2008	Victao lopes 13:53	February 13, 2008	Mdsummermsw 19:36	February 13, 2008	Cloudz679 19:36	February 13, 2008	Mdsummermsw 16:46	February 14, 2008	Icarus3 16:47	February 14, 2008	Mdsummermsw 16:56	February 14, 2008	Mdsummermsw 16:56	February 14, 2008	Icarus3 18:52	February 14, 2008	Mdsummermsw 18:53	February 14, 2008	Icarus3 18:56	February 14, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:27	February 17, 2008	Icarus3 20:28	February 17, 2008	Cloudz679 20:29	February 17, 2008	Icarus3 20:34	February 17, 2008	Icarus3 20:35	February 17, 2008	Cloudz679 20:37	February 17, 2008	Icarus3 20:38	February 17, 2008	Cloudz679 20:38	February 17, 2008	Icarus3 20:40	February 17, 2008	Icarus3 20:40	February 17, 2008	Cloudz679 20:42	February 17, 2008	Icarus3 20:45	February 17, 2008	Cloudz679 20:45	February 19, 2008	Cloudz679 20:46	February 19, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:52	February 19, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:53	February 19, 2008	Cloudz679 20:54	February 19, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:57	February 19, 2008	Mdsummermsw 20:58	February 19, 2008	Cloudz679 20:59	February 19, 2008	Mdsummermsw 21:06	February 19, 2008	Mdsummermsw 21:09	February 19, 2008	Cloudz679 21:19	February 19, 2008	Icarus3 21:19	February 19, 2008	Icarus3 21:22	February 19, 2008	Mdsummermsw 21:22	February 19, 2008	Mdsummermsw 21:22	February 19, 2008	Icarus3 21:24	February 19, 2008	Mdsummermsw 23:39	February 19, 2008	Cloudz679 23:44	February 19, 2008	Victao lopes 23:54	February 19, 2008	Cloudz679 00:14	February 20, 2008	Cloudz679 If anyone believes that I could edit a page, log out, log in as another user, go to a different page and edit that page all in the space of one minute, I would seriously like to know how. I don't think there's much point in further discussion of this. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Good point, indeed. Victao lopes (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Eh, I might as well comment on this matter, since I am technically implicated... Soccermeko was accused of sockpuppetry due to suspicious editing patterns. The four of us were because we've happened to work more-or-less together in containing Soccermeko's damage. Other than this case, we've all had years of editing experience. I haven't poured over the other three's contribution histories, but I know that for my part I have had no significant history (if any at all) of working together with any of them on particular articles or other matters prior to this (unlike true sockpuppets who are recognized through the high degree of overlap in their articles and editing patterns). Like Victao, I am not even familiar with Wray's music. I do not have, nor have I ever expressed, an interest in deleting her article if only I could figure out some excuse to do so. I'm interested in deleting articles on non-notable material, and she herself appears to be notable even though the unreleased CDs and mixtapes are not. This accusation is at best completely baseless, and at worst bad faith. --Icarus (Hi!) 20:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Please, you will make anything up to get you off the case. For we know, you could have had someone help you with this. Either way, It to me like fingers all pointing to you. Mdsummermsw/Cloudz972/ we know you are the same person and when i say we i mean wikipedia, me, other users and adminstrators. That reason why you and Cloudz aways know which pages to go to and why protest against pages you don't like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccermeko (talk • contribs) 22:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Provide evidence and I will respond. Until then, I consider this matter closed. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Revenge accusations by User:Soccermeko, who is banned as a puppeteer.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 12:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)